Athlon II X4 635 vs Pentium P6100
Athlon II X4 635
Pentium P6100
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon II X4 635 is positioned at rank 1069 and the Pentium P6100 is on rank 825, so the Pentium P6100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X4 635
Performance Per Dollar Pentium P6100
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon II X4 635 | Pentium P6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($250) | ✅ More affordable ($16.39) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Propus (2009−2011) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon II X4 635 | Pentium P6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1423%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($250) | ✅ More affordable ($16.39) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II X4 635 and Pentium P6100
Athlon II X4 635
The Athlon II X4 635 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,248 points. Launch price was $70.
Pentium P6100
The Pentium P6100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,245 points. Launch price was $12.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X4 635 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium P6100 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon II X4 635 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Athlon II X4 635 versus 2 GHz on the Pentium P6100 — a 36.7% clock advantage for the Athlon II X4 635 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Athlon II X4 635 uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium P6100 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 635 scores 2,248 against the Pentium P6100's 2,245 — a 0.1% lead for the Athlon II X4 635. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 635 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium P6100.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 635 | Pentium P6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.9 GHz+45% | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+45% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Propus (2009−2011) | Arrandale (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,248 | 2,245 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 658 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 180 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 550 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X4 635 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium P6100 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 635 | Pentium P6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 / DDR2-1066 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon II X4 635) / not specified (Pentium P6100). Primary use case: Athlon II X4 635 targets Budget.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 635 | Pentium P6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
The Athlon II X4 635 launched at $400 MSRP, while the Pentium P6100 debuted at $100. At current prices ($250 vs $16.39), the Pentium P6100 is $234 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X4 635 delivers 9.0 pts/$ vs 137.0 pts/$ for the Pentium P6100 — making the Pentium P6100 the 175.4% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 635 | Pentium P6100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $400 | $100-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | $16.39-93% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.0 | 137.0+1422% |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon II X4 635 and Pentium P6100
