Athlon II X4 635
Celeron G4900T
Athlon II X4 635 vs Celeron G4900T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X4 635 vs Celeron G4900T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
Cyberpunk 2077
Dead by Daylight
Deadlock
Athlon II X4 635 vs Celeron G4900T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X4 635
2010Why buy it
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron G4900T.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (180 vs 623).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (550 vs 1,040).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 53.3 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
- ❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G4900T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Celeron G4900T
2018Why buy it
- ✅+246.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $358 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 848.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.3 vs 5.6 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Athlon II X4 635 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X4 635.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron G4900T better than Athlon II X4 635?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X4 635 vs Celeron G4900T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Athlon II X4 635
The Athlon II X4 635 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,248 points. Launch price was $70.
Celeron G4900T
The Celeron G4900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,239 points. Launch price was $42.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X4 635 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G4900T offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon II X4 635 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Athlon II X4 635 versus 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G4900T — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Athlon II X4 635 uses the Propus (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron G4900T uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 635 scores 2,248 against the Celeron G4900T's 2,239 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon II X4 635. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 180 vs 623, a 110.3% lead for the Celeron G4900T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 550 vs 1,040 (61.6% advantage for the Celeron G4900T). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 635 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G4900T.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 635 | Celeron G4900T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.9 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 14 nm-69% |
| Architecture | Propus (2009−2011) | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) |
| PassMark | 2,248 | 2,239 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 658 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 180 | 623+246% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 550 | 1,040+89% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X4 635 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G4900T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 / DDR2-1066 on the Athlon II X4 635 versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G4900T — the Celeron G4900T supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G4900T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD 770,785G,790FX,880G,890FX,970,990FX (Athlon II X4 635) and H310,B360,B365,H370,Z370,Z390 (Celeron G4900T).
| Feature | Athlon II X4 635 | Celeron G4900T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 / DDR2-1066 | DDR4-2400+80% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 64 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Athlon II X4 635 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II X4 635) vs VT-x (Celeron G4900T). The Celeron G4900T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Athlon II X4 635 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II X4 635 targets Budget, Celeron G4900T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4900T rivals Pentium G5400T.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 635 | Celeron G4900T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | UHD Graphics 610 |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x |
| Target Use | Budget | Budget |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II X4 635 was priced at $400, while the Celeron G4900T came in at $42. On launch pricing ($400 vs $42), Celeron G4900T was $358 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X4 635 delivers 5.6 pts/$ vs 53.3 pts/$ for the Celeron G4900T — making the Celeron G4900T the 161.9% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 635 | Celeron G4900T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $400 | $42-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.6 | 53.3+852% |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2018 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon II X4 635 and Celeron G4900T
