Athlon II X4 641 vs Celeron G4930T

Athlon II X4 641 vs Celeron G4930T Performance Spectrum

Athlon II X4 641

4 / 4

2,313

+1.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron G4930T

2 / 2

2,287

0.0%

Core i7-660UM

Celeron G1620T

Pentium Dual Core T2390

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X4 641 vs Celeron G4930T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X4 641 vs Celeron G4930T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X4 641

2012

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.7 vs 54.5 PassMark/$ ($102 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
❌185.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G4930T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Celeron G4930T

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $60 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $102 MSRP).
✅Delivers 140.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 54.5 vs 22.7 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $102 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 100W, a 65W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Athlon II X4 641 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,287 vs 2,313).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G4930T better than Athlon II X4 641?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G4930T is ahead with a 2.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X4 641 pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X4 641 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G4930T is the better buy right now. Celeron G4930T comes in $60 cheaper on MSRP at $42 MSRP versus $102 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Athlon II X4 641 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.1% better PassMark. It is also 140.1% better value on MSRP (54.5 vs 22.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G4930T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon II X4 641 vs Celeron G4930T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X4 641

The Athlon II X4 641 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,313 points. Launch price was $149.

Celeron G4930T

The Celeron G4930T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,287 points. Launch price was $42.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon II X4 641 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G4930T offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon II X4 641 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Athlon II X4 641 versus 3 GHz on the Celeron G4930T — a 6.9% clock advantage for the Celeron G4930T (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Athlon II X4 641 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron G4930T uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 641 scores 2,313 against the Celeron G4930T's 2,287 — a 1.1% lead for the Athlon II X4 641. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 641 vs 2 MB on the Celeron G4930T.

Feature	Athlon II X4 641	Celeron G4930T
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	3 GHz+7%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3 GHz+7%
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512 kB
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
PassMark	2,313+1%	2,287
Geekbench 6 Single	—	599
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	927

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X4 641 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G4930T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Athlon II X4 641 versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G4930T — the Celeron G4930T supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 64 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD FM1 (Athlon II X4 641) and H310,B360,B365,H370,Z370,Z390 (Celeron G4930T).

Feature	Athlon II X4 641	Celeron G4930T
Socket	FM1	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	DDR4-2400+29%
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon II X4 641) / VT-x (Celeron G4930T). The Celeron G4930T includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Athlon II X4 641 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4930T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4930T rivals Pentium G5420T.

Feature	Athlon II X4 641	Celeron G4930T
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	UHD Graphics 610
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x
Target Use	—	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II X4 641 was priced at $102, while the Celeron G4930T came in at $42. On launch pricing ($102 vs $42), Celeron G4930T was $60 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X4 641 delivers 22.7 pts/$ vs 54.5 pts/$ for the Celeron G4930T — making the Celeron G4930T the 82.4% better value option.

Feature	Athlon II X4 641	Celeron G4930T
MSRP	$102	$42-59%
Performance per Dollar	22.7	54.5+140%
Release Date	2012	2019

Search Athlon II X4 641 on Amazon

Search Celeron G4930T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.