Athlon II X4 641
VS
Xeon E5-2603

Athlon II X4 641 vs Xeon E5-2603

AMD

Athlon II X4 641

4 Cores4 Thrd100 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2603

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon II X4 641 is positioned at rank 733 and the Xeon E5-2603 is on rank 825, so the Athlon II X4 641 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X4 641

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
13744%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
12987%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9429%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2841%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2250%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1968%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1127%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1113%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1013%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1013%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1002%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
975%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
961%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
957%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
949%
#288
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
97%
#392
Celeron G4920
MSRP: $52|Avg: $115
98%
#733
Athlon II X4 641
MSRP: $102|Avg: $102
100%
#734
Athlon II X3 460
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
100%
#735
Pentium G2100T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $10
99%
#736
Core i5-3330
MSRP: $182|Avg: $21
99%
#737
Pentium E5300
MSRP: $62|Avg: $25
99%
#738
Core i3-4330T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
99%
#739
Athlon II X2 215
MSRP: $45|Avg: $10
99%
#740
Core i7-4790S
MSRP: $312|Avg: $60
99%
#741
Pentium G2020T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $69
99%
#742
FX-6100
MSRP: $165|Avg: $25
99%
#743
Core i7-4771
MSRP: $320|Avg: $78
98%
#745
Core i7-4770S
MSRP: $305|Avg: $35
98%
#747
Core i5-6400T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $40
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2603

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
17870%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
3374%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2998%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
2316%
#469
EPYC 9554
MSRP: $9087|Avg: $2795
99%
#470
Xeon Gold 6338T
MSRP: $3139|Avg: $1795
98%
#471
Xeon E5-2650 v4
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $45
98%
#472
EPYC 9845
MSRP: $13564|Avg: $8670
97%
#473
EPYC 7F32
MSRP: $2100|Avg: $179
95%
#474
EPYC 9654P
MSRP: $10625|Avg: $5345
94%
#475
EPYC 9965
MSRP: $14813|Avg: $10000
93%
#825
Xeon E5-2603
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#827
Xeon W3565
MSRP: $294|Avg: $69
99%
#837
Xeon W3550
MSRP: $294|Avg: $30
95%
#839
Xeon E5-2450
MSRP: $694|Avg: $795
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-2603 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightAthlon II X4 641Xeon E5-2603
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($102)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon II X4 641 ($102), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($102 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightAthlon II X4 641Xeon E5-2603
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($102)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II X4 641 and Xeon E5-2603

AMD

Athlon II X4 641

The Athlon II X4 641 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,313 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Xeon E5-2603

The Xeon E5-2603 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,325 points. Launch price was $207.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II X4 641 and Xeon E5-2603 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Athlon II X4 641 versus 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2603 — a 43.5% clock advantage for the Athlon II X4 641 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Athlon II X4 641 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E5-2603 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 641 scores 2,313 against the Xeon E5-2603's 2,325 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5-2603. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 641 vs 10240 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2603.

FeatureAthlon II X4 641Xeon E5-2603
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz+56%
1.8 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz+56%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
10240 kB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Llano (2011−2012)
Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark
2,313
2,325
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X4 641 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5-2603 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon II X4 641Xeon E5-2603
Socket
FM1
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16