Athlon II X4 641 vs Core 2 Duo T7500
Athlon II X4 641
Core 2 Duo T7500
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon II X4 641 is positioned at rank 733 and the Core 2 Duo T7500 is on rank 88, so the Core 2 Duo T7500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X4 641
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T7500
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon II X4 641 | Core 2 Duo T7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($102) | ✅ More affordable ($5) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon II X4 641 | Core 2 Duo T7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1936%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($102) | ✅ More affordable ($5) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II X4 641 and Core 2 Duo T7500
Athlon II X4 641
The Athlon II X4 641 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,313 points. Launch price was $149.
Core 2 Duo T7500
The Core 2 Duo T7500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 May 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,308 points. Launch price was $234.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X4 641 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T7500 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon II X4 641 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Athlon II X4 641 versus 2.2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T7500 — a 24% clock advantage for the Athlon II X4 641 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Athlon II X4 641 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T7500 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 641 scores 2,313 against the Core 2 Duo T7500's 2,308 — a 0.2% lead for the Athlon II X4 641. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 641 | Core 2 Duo T7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz+27% | 2.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+27% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 4 MB+300% |
| Process | 32 nm-51% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Llano (2011−2012) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| PassMark | 2,313 | 2,308 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 507 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X4 641 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T7500 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Athlon II X4 641 versus DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T7500 — the Athlon II X4 641 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: AMD FM1 (Athlon II X4 641) and GM965,PM965 (Core 2 Duo T7500).
| Feature | Athlon II X4 641 | Core 2 Duo T7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM1 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866+50% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon II X4 641) / VT-x (Core 2 Duo T7500). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo T7500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo T7500 rivals Athlon Silver 3050U.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 641 | Core 2 Duo T7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Athlon II X4 641 launched at $102 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo T7500 debuted at $316. At current prices ($102 vs $5), the Core 2 Duo T7500 is $97 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X4 641 delivers 22.7 pts/$ vs 461.6 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo T7500 — making the Core 2 Duo T7500 the 181.3% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X4 641 | Core 2 Duo T7500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $102-68% | $316 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $102 | $5-95% |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.7 | 461.6+1933% |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2007 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon II X4 641 and Core 2 Duo T7500
