Athlon II X4 641
VS
Core i5-4210U

Athlon II X4 641 vs Core i5-4210U

AMD

Athlon II X4 641

4 Cores4 Thrd100 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i5-4210U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon II X4 641 is positioned at rank 733 and the Core i5-4210U is on rank 214, so the Core i5-4210U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X4 641

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
13744%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
12987%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9429%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2841%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2250%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1968%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1127%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1113%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1013%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1013%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1002%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
975%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
961%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
957%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
949%
#288
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
97%
#392
Celeron G4920
MSRP: $52|Avg: $115
98%
#733
Athlon II X4 641
MSRP: $102|Avg: $102
100%
#734
Athlon II X3 460
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
100%
#735
Pentium G2100T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $10
99%
#736
Core i5-3330
MSRP: $182|Avg: $21
99%
#737
Pentium E5300
MSRP: $62|Avg: $25
99%
#738
Core i3-4330T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
99%
#739
Athlon II X2 215
MSRP: $45|Avg: $10
99%
#740
Core i7-4790S
MSRP: $312|Avg: $60
99%
#741
Pentium G2020T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $69
99%
#742
FX-6100
MSRP: $165|Avg: $25
99%
#743
Core i7-4771
MSRP: $320|Avg: $78
98%
#745
Core i7-4770S
MSRP: $305|Avg: $35
98%
#747
Core i5-6400T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $40
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4210U

#57
Ryzen AI 9 365
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
98%
#202
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
380%
#203
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
374%
#204
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
344%
#205
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
342%
#206
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
339%
#208
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
327%
#209
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
314%
#210
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
313%
#211
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
305%
#214
Core i5-4210U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Athlon II X4 641 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i5-4210U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightAthlon II X4 641Core i5-4210U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($102)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAthlon II X4 641Core i5-4210U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($102)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II X4 641 and Core i5-4210U

AMD

Athlon II X4 641

The Athlon II X4 641 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,313 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i5-4210U

The Core i5-4210U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,316 points. Launch price was $281.

Processing Power

The Athlon II X4 641 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-4210U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X4 641 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Athlon II X4 641 versus 2.7 GHz on the Core i5-4210U — a 3.6% clock advantage for the Athlon II X4 641 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Athlon II X4 641 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-4210U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X4 641 scores 2,313 against the Core i5-4210U's 2,316 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-4210U. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 641 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-4210U.

FeatureAthlon II X4 641Core i5-4210U
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz+4%
2.7 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz+65%
1.7 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+300%
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Llano (2011−2012)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
2,313
2,316
Geekbench 6 Single
763
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X4 641 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-4210U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1866 memory speed. The Athlon II X4 641 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon II X4 641) vs 12 (Core i5-4210U) — the Athlon II X4 641 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD FM1 (Athlon II X4 641) and HM86,HM87,QM87 (Core i5-4210U).

FeatureAthlon II X4 641Core i5-4210U
Socket
FM1
FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+300%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+33%
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon II X4 641) / VT-x, EPT (Core i5-4210U). The Core i5-4210U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4400), while the Athlon II X4 641 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4210U targets Thin & Light Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-4210U rivals A8-6410.

FeatureAthlon II X4 641Core i5-4210U
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4400
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, EPT
Target Use
Thin & Light Laptop