Athlon MP 2800+ vs Core i5-10400F
Athlon MP 2800+
Core i5-10400F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Athlon MP 2800+ is positioned at rank #1026 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon MP 2800+
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-10400F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon MP 2800+ | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($102) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (K7 (2000−2004) / 130 nm) | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon MP 2800+ | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+236%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($102) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon MP 2800+ and Core i5-10400F
Athlon MP 2800+
The Athlon MP 2800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 May 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the K7 (2000−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.13 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 380 points. Launch price was $275.
Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The Athlon MP 2800+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 5 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.13 GHz on the Athlon MP 2800+ versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 67.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F. The Athlon MP 2800+ uses the K7 (2000−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon MP 2800+ scores 380 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 188.7% lead for the Core i5-10400F.
| Feature | Athlon MP 2800+ | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 6 / 12+500% |
| Boost Clock | 2.13 GHz | 4.3 GHz+102% |
| Base Clock | — | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 130 nm | 14 nm-89% |
| Architecture | K7 (2000−2004) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 380 | 13,029+3329% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 8,191 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,454 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 5,783 |
Memory & Platform
Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-266 on the Athlon MP 2800+ versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F — the Core i5-10400F supports -206.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Athlon MP 2800+) vs 2 (Core i5-10400F). PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon MP 2800+) vs 16 (Core i5-10400F) — the Core i5-10400F offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD Socket A (Athlon MP 2800+) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | Athlon MP 2800+ | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | — | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR-266 | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 128 GB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon MP 2800+) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Athlon MP 2800+ | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Athlon MP 2800+ launched at $275 MSRP, while the Core i5-10400F debuted at $160. At current prices ($10 vs $102), the Athlon MP 2800+ is $92 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon MP 2800+ delivers 38.0 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400F — making the Core i5-10400F the 108.3% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon MP 2800+ | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $275 | $160-42% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-90% | $102 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.0 | 127.7+236% |
| Release Date | 2003 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon MP 2800+ and Core i5-10400F
