
Athlon PRO 3045B

Core i5-10400F
Athlon PRO 3045B vs Core i5-10400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon PRO 3045B vs Core i5-10400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon PRO 3045B vs Core i5-10400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon PRO 3045B
2021Why buy it
- β Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Vega 3, while Core i5-10400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-10400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (2,770 vs 13,029).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 6.5 vs 81.4 PassMark/$ ($426 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-10400F.
Core i5-10400F
2020Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +186.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
- β Costs $266 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
- β Delivers 1152.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.4 vs 6.5 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
- β 100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- β333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Athlon PRO 3045B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-10400F better than Athlon PRO 3045B?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon PRO 3045B vs Core i5-10400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon PRO 3045B
The Athlon PRO 3045B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Dali (2020β2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,770 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-10400F
The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020β2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.
Processing Power
The Athlon PRO 3045B packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads β the Core i5-10400F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Athlon PRO 3045B versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F β a 29.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Athlon PRO 3045B uses the Dali (2020β2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020β2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon PRO 3045B scores 2,770 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 β a 129.9% lead for the Core i5-10400F. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Athlon PRO 3045B vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.
| Feature | Athlon PRO 3045B | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 6 / 12+200% |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 4.3 GHz+34% |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 2.9 GHz+26% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 12 MB (total)+200% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Dali (2020β2021) | Comet Lake (2020β2025) |
| PassMark | 2,770 | 13,029+370% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 8,191 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 1,454 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 5,783 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon PRO 3045B uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Athlon PRO 3045B versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F β the Core i5-10400F supports 11.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB β 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Athlon PRO 3045B) vs 16 (Core i5-10400F) β the Core i5-10400F offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD FP5 (Athlon PRO 3045B) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).
| Feature | Athlon PRO 3045B | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP5 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-2666+11% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 128 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 16+100% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon PRO 3045B) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). The Athlon PRO 3045B includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Vega 3), while the Core i5-10400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Athlon PRO 3045B | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | β |
| Unlocked | β | No |
| AVX-512 | β | No |
| Virtualization | β | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | β | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon PRO 3045B was priced at $426, while the Core i5-10400F came in at $160. On launch pricing ($426 vs $160), Core i5-10400F was $266 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon PRO 3045B delivers 6.5 pts/$ vs 81.4 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400F β making the Core i5-10400F the 170.4% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon PRO 3045B | Core i5-10400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $426 | $160-62% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.5 | 81.4+1152% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















