Athlon X2 340
VS
A4-6300B

Athlon X2 340 vs A4-6300B

AMD

Athlon X2 340

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2012
VS
AMD

A4-6300B

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon X2 340 is positioned at rank 462 and the A4-6300B is on rank 745, so the Athlon X2 340 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon X2 340

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
7016%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
6629%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4813%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1450%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1149%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1005%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
576%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
568%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
517%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
517%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
511%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
498%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
491%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
489%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
484%
#360
Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#361
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2442
100%
#362
Core i9-14901E
MSRP: $557|Avg: $689
99%
#363
Celeron G5900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
99%
#364
Celeron G6900TE
MSRP: $53|Avg: $64
98%
#365
Core i5-8600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $213
97%
#366
Celeron G4950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $63
97%
#462
Athlon X2 340
MSRP: $30|Avg: $15
100%
#466
Pentium G4600
MSRP: $82|Avg: $116
100%
#467
Celeron G3900TE
MSRP: $42|Avg: $45
99%
#471
Pentium G4620
MSRP: $86|Avg: $154
98%
#476
Athlon X4 830
MSRP: $70|Avg: $25
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A4-6300B

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
14086%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
13310%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9664%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2911%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2306%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2017%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1155%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1140%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1038%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1038%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1027%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
999%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
985%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
981%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
972%
#288
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
100%
#745
A4-6300B
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#746
Core i7-4770S
MSRP: $305|Avg: $35
100%
#748
Core i5-6400T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $40
100%
#749
Core i5-3570K
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
100%
#750
Athlon II X3 455
MSRP: $88|Avg: $15
100%
#751
Core i5-3570S
MSRP: $213|Avg: $59
99%
#752
Core i7-3770
MSRP: $294|Avg: $60
99%
#753
Pentium G2120
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
99%
#754
Core i5-3340S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $25
98%
#755
Celeron G1101
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
98%
#756
FX-8150
MSRP: $245|Avg: $50
98%
#757
Pentium G3240
MSRP: $89|Avg: $126
98%
#758
Core i5-3550S
MSRP: $205|Avg: $100
98%
#759
FX-8140
MSRP: $225|Avg: $120
98%
#760
Athlon X2 450
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A4-6300B leads in gaming performance. However, the Athlon X2 340 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.4% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightAthlon X2 340A4-6300B
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAthlon X2 340A4-6300B
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon X2 340 and A4-6300B

AMD

Athlon X2 340

The Athlon X2 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,333 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

A4-6300B

The A4-6300B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,328 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon X2 340 and A4-6300B share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Athlon X2 340 versus 3.9 GHz on the A4-6300B — a 8% clock advantage for the A4-6300B (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Athlon X2 340 uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the A4-6300B uses Richland (2013−2014) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X2 340 scores 1,333 against the A4-6300B's 1,328 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon X2 340. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 397 vs 415, a 4.4% lead for the A4-6300B that directly translates to higher frame rates.

FeatureAthlon X2 340A4-6300B
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
3.9 GHz+8%
Base Clock
3.2 GHz
3.7 GHz+16%
L2 Cache
1 MB (total)
1 MB (total)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Trinity (2012−2013)
Richland (2013−2014)
PassMark
1,333
1,328
Geekbench 6 Single
397
415+5%
Geekbench 6 Multi
549
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the FM2 socket with PCIe 2.0. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75,A85X,A88X (Athlon X2 340) and A55,A58,A68H,A75,A78,A88X (A4-6300B).

FeatureAthlon X2 340A4-6300B
Socket
FM2
FM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The A4-6300B includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8370D), while the Athlon X2 340 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon X2 340 targets Desktop, A4-6300B targets Business Desktop. Direct competitor: A4-6300B rivals Pentium G3240.

FeatureAthlon X2 340A4-6300B
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8370D
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
AMD-V
Target Use
Desktop
Business Desktop