Athlon X2 340 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58

Athlon X2 340 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58 Performance Spectrum

Athlon X2 340

2 / 2

1,333

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Turion 64 X2 TL-58

2 / 2

1,339

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X2 340 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X2 340 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X2 340

2012

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (AMD Stock), unlike Turion 64 X2 TL-58.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,333 vs 1,339).
❌Launch MSRP is still $30 MSRP, while Turion 64 X2 TL-58 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌6400% higher power demand at 65W vs 1W.

Turion 64 X2 TL-58

2007

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 1W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon X2 340.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon X2 340 better than Turion 64 X2 TL-58?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon X2 340 is ahead with a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 X2 TL-58 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon X2 340 is the better buy right now. Athlon X2 340 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $30 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.5% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (44.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon X2 340 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon X2 340 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X2 340

The Athlon X2 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,333 points. Launch price was $149.

Turion 64 X2 TL-58

The Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Tyler (2007−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,339 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon X2 340 and Turion 64 X2 TL-58 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Athlon X2 340 versus 1.9 GHz on the Turion 64 X2 TL-58 — a 61.8% clock advantage for the Athlon X2 340. The Athlon X2 340 uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-58 uses Tyler (2007−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X2 340 scores 1,333 against the Turion 64 X2 TL-58's 1,339 — a 0.4% lead for the Turion 64 X2 TL-58.

Feature	Athlon X2 340	Turion 64 X2 TL-58
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz+89%	1.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	—
L2 Cache	1 MB (total)	1 MB
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Tyler (2007−2009)
PassMark	1,333	1,339
Geekbench 6 Single	397	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	549	—