Athlon X2 340 vs Processor N50

AMD

Athlon X2 340

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Processor N50

2 Cores2 Thrd0 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2023
Similar parts
·······

Athlon X2 340 vs Processor N50 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X2 340 vs Processor N50 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X2 340 vs Processor N50: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X2 340

2012

Why buy it

  • Costs $98 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $128 MSRP).
  • Delivers 324.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 10.5 PassMark/$ ($30 MSRP vs $128 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (AMD Stock), unlike Processor N50.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,333 vs 1,339).
  • Older platform position on FM2, while Processor N50 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.

Processor N50

2023

Why buy it

  • +0.5% higher PassMark.
  • Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of FM2 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.5 vs 44.4 PassMark/$ ($128 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon X2 340.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon X2 340 better than Processor N50?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon X2 340 is ahead with a 2.7% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Processor N50 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Processor N50 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Athlon X2 340 is the better buy right now. Athlon X2 340 comes in $98 cheaper on MSRP at $30 MSRP versus $128 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.7% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Processor N50 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.5% better PassMark. It is also 324.8% better value on MSRP (44.4 vs 10.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Processor N50 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2012), a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of FM2, and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Athlon X2 340 vs Processor N50 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon X2 340

The Athlon X2 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,333 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Processor N50

The Processor N50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): + 6 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,339 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon X2 340 and Processor N50 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Athlon X2 340 versus 3.4 GHz on the Processor N50 — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Athlon X2 340 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 1 GHz). The Athlon X2 340 uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Processor N50 uses Alder Lake-N (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X2 340 scores 1,333 against the Processor N50's 1,339 — a 0.4% lead for the Processor N50.

FeatureAthlon X2 340Processor N50
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz+6%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+220%
1 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (total)
2 MB (total)+100%
Process
32 nm
10 nm-69%
Architecture
Trinity (2012−2013)
Alder Lake-N (2023)
PassMark
1,333
1,339
Geekbench 6 Single
397
Geekbench 6 Multi
549
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X2 340 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Processor N50 uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon X2 340Processor N50
Socket
FM2
FCBGA1264
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 5.0+150%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon X2 340) / not specified (Processor N50). Primary use case: Athlon X2 340 targets Desktop.

FeatureAthlon X2 340Processor N50
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon X2 340 was priced at $30, while the Processor N50 came in at $128. On launch pricing ($30 vs $128), Athlon X2 340 was $98 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X2 340 delivers 44.4 pts/$ vs 10.5 pts/$ for the Processor N50 — making the Athlon X2 340 the 123.8% better value option.

FeatureAthlon X2 340Processor N50
MSRP
$30-77%
$128
Performance per Dollar
44.4+323%
10.5
Release Date
2012
2023

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.