Athlon X2 340
VS
A8-4555M

Athlon X2 340 vs A8-4555M

AMD

Athlon X2 340

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2012
VS
AMD

A8-4555M

4 Cores4 Thrd19 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon X2 340 is positioned at rank 462 and the A8-4555M is on rank 826, so the Athlon X2 340 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon X2 340

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
7016%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
6629%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4813%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1450%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1149%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1005%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
576%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
568%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
517%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
517%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
511%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
498%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
491%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
489%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
484%
#360
Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#361
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2442
100%
#362
Core i9-14901E
MSRP: $557|Avg: $689
99%
#363
Celeron G5900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
99%
#364
Celeron G6900TE
MSRP: $53|Avg: $64
98%
#365
Core i5-8600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $213
97%
#366
Celeron G4950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $63
97%
#462
Athlon X2 340
MSRP: $30|Avg: $15
100%
#466
Pentium G4600
MSRP: $82|Avg: $116
100%
#467
Celeron G3900TE
MSRP: $42|Avg: $45
99%
#471
Pentium G4620
MSRP: $86|Avg: $154
98%
#476
Athlon X4 830
MSRP: $70|Avg: $25
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A8-4555M

#814
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1313%
#815
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1294%
#816
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1187%
#817
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1182%
#818
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1171%
#820
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1131%
#821
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1085%
#822
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1083%
#823
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1054%
#826
A8-4555M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#828
Celeron M 575
MSRP: $86|Avg: $12
100%
#829
Core i7-10710U
MSRP: $415|Avg: N/A
100%
#835
FX-9830P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
98%
#836
Celeron M P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#838
Celeron 887
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Athlon X2 340 leads in gaming performance. However, the A8-4555M is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightAthlon X2 340A8-4555M
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAthlon X2 340A8-4555M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon X2 340 and A8-4555M

AMD

Athlon X2 340

The Athlon X2 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,333 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

A8-4555M

The A8-4555M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 19 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,341 points. Launch price was $90.

Processing Power

The Athlon X2 340 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the A8-4555M offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A8-4555M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Athlon X2 340 versus 2.4 GHz on the A8-4555M — a 40% clock advantage for the Athlon X2 340 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). Both are built on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture using a 32 nm process. In PassMark, the Athlon X2 340 scores 1,333 against the A8-4555M's 1,341 — a 0.6% lead for the A8-4555M.

FeatureAthlon X2 340A8-4555M
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz+50%
2.4 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+100%
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB (total)
4 MB (total)+300%
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Trinity (2012−2013)
Trinity (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,333
1,341
Geekbench 6 Single
397
Geekbench 6 Multi
549
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X2 340 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A8-4555M uses FP2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Athlon X2 340 versus 1333 on the A8-4555M — the A8-4555M supports 199.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X2 340 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75,A85X,A88X (Athlon X2 340) and FP2 (A8-4555M).

FeatureAthlon X2 340A8-4555M
Socket
FM2
FP2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
1333+44333%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+209715100%
16
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon X2 340) vs true (A8-4555M). The A8-4555M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7600G), while the Athlon X2 340 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon X2 340 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A8-4555M rivals Core i3-2367M.

FeatureAthlon X2 340A8-4555M
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 7600G
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
true
Target Use
Desktop