Athlon X2 BE-2350
Celeron T3100
Athlon X2 BE-2350 vs Celeron T3100 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon X2 BE-2350 vs Celeron T3100 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon X2 BE-2350 vs Celeron T3100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon X2 BE-2350
2007Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.8 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($90 MSRP vs $62 MSRP).
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
Celeron T3100
2008Why buy it
- ✅Costs $28 less on MSRP ($62 MSRP vs $90 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 40.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.2 vs 10.8 PassMark/$ ($62 MSRP vs $90 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (945 vs 975).
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon X2 BE-2350 better than Celeron T3100?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon X2 BE-2350 vs Celeron T3100 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Athlon X2 BE-2350
The Athlon X2 BE-2350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 975 points. Launch price was $149.
Celeron T3100
The Celeron T3100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 945 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Athlon X2 BE-2350 is built on the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture. In PassMark, the Athlon X2 BE-2350 scores 975 against the Celeron T3100's 945 — a 3.1% lead for the Athlon X2 BE-2350. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon X2 BE-2350 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron T3100.
| Feature | Athlon X2 BE-2350 | Celeron T3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | — |
| Boost Clock | 2.1 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | — | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | — |
| Process | 65 nm | 45 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Brisbane (2007−2008) | — |
| PassMark | 975+3% | 945 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 350 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 650 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon X2 BE-2350 uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron T3100 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR2-800 memory speed. The Athlon X2 BE-2350 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD AM2 (Athlon X2 BE-2350) and GL40,GM45 (Celeron T3100).
| Feature | Athlon X2 BE-2350 | Celeron T3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM2 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | DDR3-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon X2 BE-2350) / None (Celeron T3100). Primary use case: Celeron T3100 targets Legacy Laptop.
| Feature | Athlon X2 BE-2350 | Celeron T3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | None |
| Target Use | — | Legacy Laptop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon X2 BE-2350 was priced at $90, while the Celeron T3100 came in at $62. On launch pricing ($90 vs $62), Celeron T3100 was $28 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X2 BE-2350 delivers 10.8 pts/$ vs 15.2 pts/$ for the Celeron T3100 — making the Celeron T3100 the 33.8% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon X2 BE-2350 | Celeron T3100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $90 | $62-31% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.8 | 15.2+41% |
| Release Date | 2007 | 2008 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon X2 BE-2350 and Celeron T3100
