Athlon X2 QL-60 vs Pentium SU2700

Athlon X2 QL-60 vs Pentium SU2700 Performance Spectrum

Athlon X2 QL-60

2 / 2

1,273

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium SU2700

1 / 1

1,268

0.0%

Celeron N3000

Pentium T3400

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X2 QL-60 vs Pentium SU2700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X2 QL-60 vs Pentium SU2700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X2 QL-60

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 10W, a 9W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium SU2700

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,268 vs 1,273).
❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while Athlon X2 QL-60 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌900% higher power demand at 10W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon X2 QL-60 better than Pentium SU2700?

Yes. Athlon X2 QL-60 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon X2 QL-60 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon X2 QL-60 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon X2 QL-60 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Athlon X2 QL-60 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium SU2700 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 0.4% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium SU2700 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon X2 QL-60 vs Pentium SU2700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X2 QL-60

The Athlon X2 QL-60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lion (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,273 points. Launch price was $149.

Pentium SU2700

The Pentium SU2700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,268 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon X2 QL-60 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium SU2700 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Athlon X2 QL-60 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Athlon X2 QL-60 versus 1.3 GHz on the Pentium SU2700 — a 37.5% clock advantage for the Athlon X2 QL-60. The Athlon X2 QL-60 uses the Lion (2008−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium SU2700 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X2 QL-60 scores 1,273 against the Pentium SU2700's 1,268 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon X2 QL-60. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon X2 QL-60	Pentium SU2700
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.9 GHz+46%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%
Process	65 nm	45 nm-31%
Architecture	Lion (2008−2009)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,273	1,268

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X2 QL-60 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium SU2700 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.