A6-3410MX vs Athlon X2 QL-60

A6-3410MX vs Athlon X2 QL-60 Performance Spectrum

A6-3410MX

4 / 4

1,274

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon X2 QL-60

2 / 2

1,273

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-3410MX vs Athlon X2 QL-60 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-3410MX vs Athlon X2 QL-60: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-3410MX

2011

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6520G, while Athlon X2 QL-60 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌4400% higher power demand at 45W vs 1W.

Athlon X2 QL-60

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 45W, a 44W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,273 vs 1,274).
❌No integrated graphics, while A6-3410MX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-3410MX better than Athlon X2 QL-60?

Yes. A6-3410MX is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A6-3410MX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6-3410MX is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-3410MX still makes the most sense overall. A6-3410MX comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-3410MX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6-3410MX vs Athlon X2 QL-60 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-3410MX

The A6-3410MX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,274 points. Launch price was $70.

Athlon X2 QL-60

The Athlon X2 QL-60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lion (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,273 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-3410MX packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon X2 QL-60 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A6-3410MX has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the A6-3410MX versus 1.9 GHz on the Athlon X2 QL-60 — a 19% clock advantage for the A6-3410MX. The A6-3410MX uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon X2 QL-60 uses Lion (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A6-3410MX scores 1,274 against the Athlon X2 QL-60's 1,273 — a 0.1% lead for the A6-3410MX. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	A6-3410MX	Athlon X2 QL-60
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz+21%	1.9 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Lion (2008−2009)
PassMark	1,274	1,273
Geekbench 6 Single	271	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-3410MX uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon X2 QL-60 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A6-3410MX versus DDR2-667 on the Athlon X2 QL-60 — the A6-3410MX supports 139.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-3410MX) vs 0 (Athlon X2 QL-60) — the A6-3410MX offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A6-3410MX	Athlon X2 QL-60
Socket	FS1	S1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+140%	DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A6-3410MX) / not specified (Athlon X2 QL-60). The A6-3410MX includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6520G), while the Athlon X2 QL-60 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-3410MX targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: A6-3410MX rivals Core i3-2330M.