A6-3410MX vs Core i3-2350M

A6-3410MX vs Core i3-2350M Performance Spectrum

A6-3410MX

4 / 4

1,274

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-2350M

2 / 4

1,276

+0.2%

Celeron N3000

Pentium T3400

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-3410MX vs Core i3-2350M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-3410MX vs Core i3-2350M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-3410MX

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 512W, a 467W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (271 vs 390).
❌Lower PassMark (1,274 vs 1,276).

Core i3-2350M

2011

Why buy it

✅+43.9% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.

Trade-offs

❌1037.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-2350M better than A6-3410MX?

Yes. Core i3-2350M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-2350M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2350M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-2350M still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-2350M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-2350M is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

A6-3410MX vs Core i3-2350M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-3410MX

The A6-3410MX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,274 points. Launch price was $70.

Core i3-2350M

The Core i3-2350M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,276 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-3410MX packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-2350M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A6-3410MX has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the A6-3410MX versus 2.3 GHz on the Core i3-2350M — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The A6-3410MX uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-2350M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A6-3410MX scores 1,274 against the Core i3-2350M's 1,276 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i3-2350M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 271 vs 390, a 36% lead for the Core i3-2350M that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-3410MX vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2350M.

Feature	A6-3410MX	Core i3-2350M
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	2.3 GHz+44%
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,274	1,276
Geekbench 6 Single	271	390+44%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	806

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-3410MX uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-2350M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A6-3410MX versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i3-2350M — the A6-3410MX supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-2350M supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	A6-3410MX	Core i3-2350M
Socket	FS1	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+20%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-3410MX) vs VT-x (Core i3-2350M). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 6520G (A6-3410MX) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2350M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-3410MX targets Mainstream Laptop, Core i3-2350M targets Laptop. Direct competitor: A6-3410MX rivals Core i3-2330M.