A6-3410MX vs Celeron G550

A6-3410MX vs Celeron G550 Performance Spectrum

A6-3410MX

4 / 4

1,274

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron G550

2 / 2

1,275

+0.1%

Celeron N3000

Pentium T3400

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-3410MX vs Celeron G550 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-3410MX vs Celeron G550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-3410MX

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (271 vs 379).
❌Lower PassMark (1,274 vs 1,275).

Celeron G550

2012

Why buy it

✅+39.9% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $52 MSRP, while A6-3410MX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G550 better than A6-3410MX?

Yes. Celeron G550 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G550 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G550 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G550 is the better buy right now. Celeron G550 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $52 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (24.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G550 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6-3410MX vs Celeron G550 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-3410MX

The A6-3410MX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,274 points. Launch price was $70.

Celeron G550

The Celeron G550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,275 points. Launch price was $80.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-3410MX packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G550 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A6-3410MX has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the A6-3410MX versus 2.6 GHz on the Celeron G550 — a 12.2% clock advantage for the Celeron G550 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The A6-3410MX uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron G550 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A6-3410MX scores 1,274 against the Celeron G550's 1,275 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron G550. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 271 vs 379, a 33.2% lead for the Celeron G550 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-3410MX vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G550.

Feature	A6-3410MX	Celeron G550
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz	2.6 GHz+13%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	2.6 GHz+63%
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,274	1,275
Geekbench 6 Single	271	379+40%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	663

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-3410MX uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G550 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A6-3410MX versus DDR3-1066 on the Celeron G550 — the A6-3410MX supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G550 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	A6-3410MX	Celeron G550
Socket	FS1	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+50%	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	32 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-3410MX) vs VT-x (Celeron G550). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 6520G (A6-3410MX) and HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G550) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-3410MX targets Mainstream Laptop, Celeron G550 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A6-3410MX rivals Core i3-2330M; Celeron G550 rivals Pentium G630.

Feature	A6-3410MX	Celeron G550
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon HD 6520G	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x
Target Use	Mainstream Laptop	Budget