A6-3410MX vs Pentium SU2700

A6-3410MX vs Pentium SU2700 Performance Spectrum

A6-3410MX

4 / 4

1,274

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium SU2700

1 / 1

1,268

0.0%

Celeron N3000

Pentium T3400

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-3410MX vs Pentium SU2700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-3410MX vs Pentium SU2700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-3410MX

2011

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6520G, while Pentium SU2700 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌350% higher power demand at 45W vs 10W.

Pentium SU2700

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 10W instead of 45W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,268 vs 1,274).
❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while A6-3410MX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A6-3410MX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-3410MX better than Pentium SU2700?

Yes. A6-3410MX is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A6-3410MX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6-3410MX is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-3410MX is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. A6-3410MX comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium SU2700 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 0.4% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-3410MX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6-3410MX vs Pentium SU2700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-3410MX

The A6-3410MX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,274 points. Launch price was $70.

Pentium SU2700

The Pentium SU2700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,268 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-3410MX packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium SU2700 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the A6-3410MX has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the A6-3410MX versus 1.3 GHz on the Pentium SU2700 — a 55.6% clock advantage for the A6-3410MX (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The A6-3410MX uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium SU2700 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A6-3410MX scores 1,274 against the Pentium SU2700's 1,268 — a 0.5% lead for the A6-3410MX. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	A6-3410MX	Pentium SU2700
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+300%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz+77%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz+23%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB+100%
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,274	1,268
Geekbench 6 Single	271	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-3410MX uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium SU2700 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A6-3410MX	Pentium SU2700
Socket	FS1	BGA956
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A6-3410MX) / not specified (Pentium SU2700). The A6-3410MX includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6520G), while the Pentium SU2700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-3410MX targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: A6-3410MX rivals Core i3-2330M.