A6-3410MX vs Core i3-4012Y

A6-3410MX vs Core i3-4012Y Performance Spectrum

A6-3410MX

4 / 4

1,274

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-4012Y

2 / 4

1,278

+0.3%

Atom D2550

Pentium T3400

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-3410MX vs Core i3-4012Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-3410MX vs Core i3-4012Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-3410MX

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 512W, a 467W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (271 vs 485).
❌Lower PassMark (1,274 vs 1,278).

Core i3-4012Y

2013

Why buy it

✅+79% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.

Trade-offs

❌1037.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4012Y better than A6-3410MX?

Yes. Core i3-4012Y is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-4012Y is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4012Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4012Y still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-4012Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4012Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6-3410MX vs Core i3-4012Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-3410MX

The A6-3410MX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,274 points. Launch price was $70.

Core i3-4012Y

The Core i3-4012Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,278 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-3410MX packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4012Y offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A6-3410MX has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the A6-3410MX versus 1.5 GHz on the Core i3-4012Y — a 42.1% clock advantage for the A6-3410MX (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The A6-3410MX uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-4012Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A6-3410MX scores 1,274 against the Core i3-4012Y's 1,278 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i3-4012Y. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 271 vs 485, a 56.6% lead for the Core i3-4012Y that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-3410MX vs 3 MB on the Core i3-4012Y.

Feature	A6-3410MX	Core i3-4012Y
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz+53%	1.5 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz+7%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512 kB
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,274	1,278
Geekbench 6 Single	271	485+79%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	988

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-3410MX uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-4012Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The Core i3-4012Y supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-3410MX) vs 12 (Core i3-4012Y) — the A6-3410MX offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A6-3410MX	Core i3-4012Y
Socket	FS1	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	DDR3L-1600 / LPDDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-3410MX) vs VT-x / EPT (Core i3-4012Y). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 6520G (A6-3410MX) and Intel HD Graphics 4200 (Core i3-4012Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-3410MX targets Mainstream Laptop, Core i3-4012Y targets Low Power. Direct competitor: A6-3410MX rivals Core i3-2330M.

Feature	A6-3410MX	Core i3-4012Y
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon HD 6520G	Intel HD Graphics 4200
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x / EPT
Target Use	Mainstream Laptop	Low Power