CPU
GPU
Athlon X2 QL-64
Athlon X2 QL-65
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon X2 QL-64 is positioned at rank 665 and the Athlon X2 QL-65 is on rank 1056, so the Athlon X2 QL-64 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon X2 QL-64
Performance Per Dollar Athlon X2 QL-65
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon X2 QL-64 | Athlon X2 QL-65 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($22) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Lion (2008−2009) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Lion (2008−2009) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon X2 QL-64 | Athlon X2 QL-65 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+45%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($22) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon X2 QL-64 and Athlon X2 QL-65
Athlon X2 QL-64
The Athlon X2 QL-64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lion (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,614 points. Launch price was $149.
Athlon X2 QL-65
The Athlon X2 QL-65 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lion (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g2. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,630 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon X2 QL-64 and Athlon X2 QL-65 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Athlon X2 QL-64 versus 2.1 GHz on the Athlon X2 QL-65 — identical boost frequencies. Both are built on the Lion (2008−2009) architecture using a 65 nm process. In PassMark, the Athlon X2 QL-64 scores 1,614 against the Athlon X2 QL-65's 1,630 — a 1% lead for the Athlon X2 QL-65. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon X2 QL-64 | Athlon X2 QL-65 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Process | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Lion (2008−2009) | Lion (2008−2009) |
| PassMark | 1,614 | 1,630 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon X2 QL-64 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon X2 QL-65 uses S1g2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR2-667 memory speed. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Socket S1 (Athlon X2 QL-64) and AMD S1 (Athlon X2 QL-65).
| Feature | Athlon X2 QL-64 | Athlon X2 QL-65 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | S1 | S1g2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon X2 QL-64) / not specified (Athlon X2 QL-65).
| Feature | Athlon X2 QL-64 | Athlon X2 QL-65 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
Value Analysis
The Athlon X2 QL-64 launched at $50 MSRP, while the Athlon X2 QL-65 debuted at $150. At current prices ($15 vs $22), the Athlon X2 QL-64 is $7 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X2 QL-64 delivers 107.6 pts/$ vs 74.1 pts/$ for the Athlon X2 QL-65 — making the Athlon X2 QL-64 the 36.9% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon X2 QL-64 | Athlon X2 QL-65 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50-67% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-32% | $22 |
| Performance per Dollar | 107.6+45% | 74.1 |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon X2 QL-64 and Athlon X2 QL-65
