Athlon X2 QL-64 vs Core i5-2557M

Athlon X2 QL-64 vs Core i5-2557M Performance Spectrum

Athlon X2 QL-64

2 / 2

1,614

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-2557M

2 / 4

1,618

+0.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X2 QL-64 vs Core i5-2557M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X2 QL-64 vs Core i5-2557M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X2 QL-64

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 17W, a 16W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,614 vs 1,618).
❌Launch MSRP is still $50 MSRP, while Core i5-2557M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-2557M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-2557M

2011

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 3000, while Athlon X2 QL-64 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌1600% higher power demand at 17W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-2557M better than Athlon X2 QL-64?

Yes. Core i5-2557M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-2557M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-2557M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-2557M is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i5-2557M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $50 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon X2 QL-64 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (32.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on S1.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-2557M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon X2 QL-64 vs Core i5-2557M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X2 QL-64

The Athlon X2 QL-64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lion (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,614 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i5-2557M

The Core i5-2557M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,618 points. Launch price was $250.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon X2 QL-64 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-2557M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Athlon X2 QL-64 versus 2.7 GHz on the Core i5-2557M — a 25% clock advantage for the Core i5-2557M. The Athlon X2 QL-64 uses the Lion (2008−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i5-2557M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X2 QL-64 scores 1,614 against the Core i5-2557M's 1,618 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i5-2557M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon X2 QL-64 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2557M.

Feature	Athlon X2 QL-64	Core i5-2557M
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.1 GHz	2.7 GHz+29%
Base Clock	—	1.7 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	65 nm	32 nm-51%
Architecture	Lion (2008−2009)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,614	1,618
Geekbench 6 Single	—	521
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	882

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X2 QL-64 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-2557M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Athlon X2 QL-64 versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-2557M — the Core i5-2557M supports 99.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon X2 QL-64) vs 16 (Core i5-2557M) — the Core i5-2557M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Socket S1 (Athlon X2 QL-64) and HM65,QS67 (Core i5-2557M).

Feature	Athlon X2 QL-64	Core i5-2557M
Socket	S1	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-667	DDR3-1333+100%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon X2 QL-64) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-2557M). The Core i5-2557M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Athlon X2 QL-64 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-2557M targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-2557M rivals Ryzen 3 3200U.