Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Athlon X2 QL-64 vs Turion X2 RM-72

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

Athlon X2 QL-64

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2009
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Turion X2 RM-72

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2009
Buy on Amazon

Athlon X2 QL-64 vs Turion X2 RM-72 Performance Spectrum

Athlon X2 QL-64
2 / 2
1,614
0.0%
brand logoAthlon 64 X2 TK-42
brand logoAthlon II X2 250
brand logoAthlon 64 X2 4200+
brand logoAthlon 64 X2 5000+
brand logoRyzen 5 7640U
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
Turion X2 RM-72
2 / 2
1,627
+0.8%
brand logoAthlon X2 BE-2300
brand logoAthlon II X2 210e
brand logoAthlon 64 X2 4200+
brand logoAthlon 64 X2 5000+
brand logoRyzen 5 7640U
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X2 QL-64 vs Turion X2 RM-72 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
Athlon X2 QL-64
low40 FPS
medium40 FPS
high40 FPS
ultra40 FPS
1080P
Turion X2 RM-72
low41 FPS
medium41 FPS
high41 FPS
ultra41 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
Athlon X2 QL-64
low40 FPS
medium40 FPS
high40 FPS
ultra40 FPS
1080P
Turion X2 RM-72
low41 FPS
medium41 FPS
high41 FPS
ultra41 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
Athlon X2 QL-64
low40 FPS
medium40 FPS
high40 FPS
ultra40 FPS
1080P
Turion X2 RM-72
low41 FPS
medium41 FPS
high41 FPS
ultra41 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
Athlon X2 QL-64
low40 FPS
medium40 FPS
high40 FPS
ultra40 FPS
1080P
Turion X2 RM-72
low41 FPS
medium41 FPS
high41 FPS
ultra41 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
Athlon X2 QL-64
low40 FPS
medium40 FPS
high40 FPS
ultra40 FPS
1080P
Turion X2 RM-72
low41 FPS
medium41 FPS
high41 FPS
ultra41 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
Athlon X2 QL-64
low40 FPS
medium40 FPS
high40 FPS
ultra40 FPS
1080P
Turion X2 RM-72
low41 FPS
medium41 FPS
high41 FPS
ultra41 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
Athlon X2 QL-64
low40 FPS
medium40 FPS
high40 FPS
ultra40 FPS
1080P
Turion X2 RM-72
low41 FPS
medium41 FPS
high41 FPS
ultra41 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
Athlon X2 QL-64
low40 FPS
medium40 FPS
high40 FPS
ultra40 FPS
1080P
Turion X2 RM-72
low41 FPS
medium41 FPS
high41 FPS
ultra41 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
Athlon X2 QL-64
low40 FPS
medium40 FPS
high40 FPS
ultra40 FPS
1080P
Turion X2 RM-72
low41 FPS
medium41 FPS
high41 FPS
ultra41 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
Athlon X2 QL-64
low40 FPS
medium40 FPS
high40 FPS
ultra40 FPS
1080P
Turion X2 RM-72
low41 FPS
medium41 FPS
high41 FPS
ultra41 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

Athlon X2 QL-64 vs Turion X2 RM-72: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X2 QL-64

2009

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Lower PassMark (1,614 vs 1,627).
    • ❌Launch MSRP is still $50 MSRP, while Turion X2 RM-72 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

    Turion X2 RM-72

    2009

    Why buy it

    • ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Turion X2 RM-72 better than Athlon X2 QL-64?
    Yes. Turion X2 RM-72 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion X2 RM-72 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Turion X2 RM-72 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Turion X2 RM-72 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $50 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon X2 QL-64 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (32.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on S1.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Turion X2 RM-72 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Athlon X2 QL-64 vs Turion X2 RM-72 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Athlon X2 QL-64

    The Athlon X2 QL-64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lion (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,614 points. Launch price was $149.

    AMD

    Turion X2 RM-72

    The Turion X2 RM-72 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Puma (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,627 points. Launch price was $69.

    ⚡

    Processing Power

    Both the Athlon X2 QL-64 and Turion X2 RM-72 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Athlon X2 QL-64 versus 2.1 GHz on the Turion X2 RM-72 — identical boost frequencies. The Athlon X2 QL-64 uses the Lion (2008−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Turion X2 RM-72 uses Puma (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X2 QL-64 scores 1,614 against the Turion X2 RM-72's 1,627 — a 0.8% lead for the Turion X2 RM-72. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeatureAthlon X2 QL-64Turion X2 RM-72
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 2
    2 / 2
    Boost Clock
    2.1 GHz
    2.1 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    1 MB
    1 MB
    Process
    65 nm
    65 nm
    Architecture
    Lion (2008−2009)
    Puma (2008−2009)
    PassMark
    1,614
    1,627
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    Both processors use the S1 socket with PCIe 2.0.

    FeatureAthlon X2 QL-64Turion X2 RM-72
    Socket
    S1
    S1
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0
    PCIe 2.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR2-667
    —
    Max RAM Capacity
    8 GB
    —
    RAM Channels
    2
    —
    ECC Support
    No
    —
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    —
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon X2 QL-64) / not specified (Turion X2 RM-72).

    FeatureAthlon X2 QL-64Turion X2 RM-72
    Integrated GPU
    No
    —
    Unlocked
    No
    —
    AVX-512
    No
    —
    Virtualization
    AMD-V
    —