Athlon X2 QL-66
VS
Celeron G1820

Athlon X2 QL-66 vs Celeron G1820

AMD

Athlon X2 QL-66

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Celeron G1820

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon X2 QL-66 is positioned at rank 1048 and the Celeron G1820 is on rank 895, so the Celeron G1820 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon X2 QL-66

#1036
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2596%
#1037
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2558%
#1038
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2349%
#1039
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2338%
#1040
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2317%
#1042
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2237%
#1043
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2145%
#1044
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2142%
#1045
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2084%
#1048
Athlon X2 QL-66
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
100%
#1049
Athlon II Neo K145
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#1050
Celeron P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
99%
#1051
Core 2 Duo U7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
99%
#1052
Pentium 987
MSRP: $134|Avg: $20
98%
#1053
Core i7-4910MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $570
98%
#1054
Pentium T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
97%
#1056
Athlon X2 QL-65
MSRP: $150|Avg: $22
96%
#1057
Pentium J2850
MSRP: $94|Avg: $94
96%
#1058
Core i7-4900MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $40
95%
#1059
Celeron P4505
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
94%
#1060
Pentium Dual Core T2370
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
94%
#1061
Pentium T4200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
94%
#1062
Core i7-2720QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
94%
#1063
Pentium 2020M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1820

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
20215%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
19101%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
13869%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4178%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3310%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2895%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1658%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1637%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1490%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1490%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1473%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1434%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1414%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1408%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1395%
#299
Core i9-7980XE
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $300
96%
#895
Celeron G1820
MSRP: $110|Avg: $15
100%
#896
Celeron E1600
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
100%
#897
Athlon II X2 270u
MSRP: $68|Avg: $10
100%
#898
Core i5-4570TE
MSRP: $202|Avg: $40
99%
#899
Core i3-2130
MSRP: $138|Avg: $138
97%
#902
Core i3-6100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $50
96%
#903
Core i3-4330TE
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
95%
#904
Pentium E5700
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
95%
#906
Athlon II X3 420e
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
94%
#908
Celeron E1500
MSRP: $53|Avg: $5
94%
#909
Pentium G6950
MSRP: $87|Avg: $25
93%
#910
Pentium J4205
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron G1820 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Athlon X2 QL-66 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightAthlon X2 QL-66Celeron G1820
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($5)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Lion (2008−2009) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Athlon X2 QL-66 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $5 (vs $15), it costs 67% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 200% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Celeron G1820.
InsightAthlon X2 QL-66Celeron G1820
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+200%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($5)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon X2 QL-66 and Celeron G1820

AMD

Athlon X2 QL-66

The Athlon X2 QL-66 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lion (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g2. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,695 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Celeron G1820

The Celeron G1820 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,696 points. Launch price was $110.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon X2 QL-66 and Celeron G1820 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Athlon X2 QL-66 versus 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G1820 — a 20.4% clock advantage for the Celeron G1820. The Athlon X2 QL-66 uses the Lion (2008−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Celeron G1820 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X2 QL-66 scores 1,695 against the Celeron G1820's 1,696 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron G1820.

FeatureAthlon X2 QL-66Celeron G1820
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
2.7 GHz+23%
Base Clock
2.7 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
65 nm
22 nm-66%
Architecture
Lion (2008−2009)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
1,695
1,696
Geekbench 6 Single
496
Geekbench 6 Multi
910
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X2 QL-66 uses the S1g2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G1820 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Athlon X2 QL-66 versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1820 — the Celeron G1820 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G1820 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon X2 QL-66) vs 16 (Celeron G1820) — the Celeron G1820 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD S1 (Athlon X2 QL-66) and H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Celeron G1820).

FeatureAthlon X2 QL-66Celeron G1820
Socket
S1g2
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
DDR3-1333+50%
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
32 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon X2 QL-66) / VT-x (Celeron G1820). The Celeron G1820 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Athlon X2 QL-66 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1820 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1820 rivals Pentium G3220.

FeatureAthlon X2 QL-66Celeron G1820
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Athlon X2 QL-66 launched at $150 MSRP, while the Celeron G1820 debuted at $110. At current prices ($5 vs $15), the Athlon X2 QL-66 is $10 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X2 QL-66 delivers 339.0 pts/$ vs 113.1 pts/$ for the Celeron G1820 — making the Athlon X2 QL-66 the 100% better value option.

FeatureAthlon X2 QL-66Celeron G1820
MSRP
$150
$110-27%
Avg Price (30d)
$5-67%
$15
Performance per Dollar
339.0+200%
113.1
Release Date
2009
2013