Athlon X2 QL-66 vs Pentium G3240T

Athlon X2 QL-66 vs Pentium G3240T Performance Spectrum

Athlon X2 QL-66

2 / 2

1,695

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium G3240T

2 / 2

1,693

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X2 QL-66 vs Pentium G3240T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X2 QL-66 vs Pentium G3240T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X2 QL-66

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.3 vs 26.5 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).

Pentium G3240T

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $86 less on MSRP ($64 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 134.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 26.5 vs 11.3 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,693 vs 1,695).
❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon X2 QL-66 better than Pentium G3240T?

Yes. Athlon X2 QL-66 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon X2 QL-66 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon X2 QL-66 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon X2 QL-66 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Athlon X2 QL-66 comes in 134.4% more expensive on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $64 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium G3240T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2014 platform. Even with 134.1% better value on paper (26.5 vs 11.3 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium G3240T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon X2 QL-66 vs Pentium G3240T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X2 QL-66

The Athlon X2 QL-66 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lion (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g2. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,695 points. Launch price was $149.

Pentium G3240T

The Pentium G3240T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,693 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon X2 QL-66 and Pentium G3240T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. The Athlon X2 QL-66 is built on the Lion (2008−2009) architecture. In PassMark, the Athlon X2 QL-66 scores 1,695 against the Pentium G3240T's 1,693 — a 0.1% lead for the Athlon X2 QL-66.

Feature	Athlon X2 QL-66	Pentium G3240T
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	—
Base Clock	—	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache	1 MB	—
Process	65 nm	22 nm-66%
Architecture	Lion (2008−2009)	—
PassMark	1,695	1,693

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon X2 QL-66 uses the S1g2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G3240T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon X2 QL-66	Pentium G3240T
Socket	S1g2	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-667	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon X2 QL-66 was priced at $150, while the Pentium G3240T came in at $64. On launch pricing ($150 vs $64), Pentium G3240T was $86 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X2 QL-66 delivers 11.3 pts/$ vs 26.5 pts/$ for the Pentium G3240T — making the Pentium G3240T the 80.3% better value option.

Feature	Athlon X2 QL-66	Pentium G3240T
MSRP	$150	$64-57%
Performance per Dollar	11.3	26.5+135%
Release Date	2009	2014

Search Athlon X2 QL-66 on Amazon

Search Pentium G3240T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.