
Athlon X2 QL-66

Atom D525
Athlon X2 QL-66 vs Atom D525 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon X2 QL-66 vs Atom D525 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon X2 QL-66 vs Atom D525: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon X2 QL-66
2009Why buy it
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 13W, a 12W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,695 vs 1,707).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.3 vs 27.1 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $63 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Atom D525 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Atom D525
2010Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $87 less on MSRP ($63 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 139.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.1 vs 11.3 PassMark/$ ($63 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3150, while Athlon X2 QL-66 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌1200% higher power demand at 13W vs 1W.
Quick Answers
So, is Atom D525 better than Athlon X2 QL-66?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon X2 QL-66 vs Atom D525 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X2 QL-66
The Athlon X2 QL-66 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lion (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g2. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,695 points. Launch price was $149.

Atom D525
The Atom D525 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pinetrail (2009−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,707 points. Launch price was $63.
Processing Power
The Athlon X2 QL-66 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Atom D525's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Athlon X2 QL-66 versus 1.83 GHz on the Atom D525 — a 18.4% clock advantage for the Athlon X2 QL-66. The Athlon X2 QL-66 uses the Lion (2008−2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Atom D525 uses Pinetrail (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X2 QL-66 scores 1,695 against the Atom D525's 1,707 — a 0.7% lead for the Atom D525.
| Feature | Athlon X2 QL-66 | Atom D525 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz+20% | 1.83 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 65 nm | 45 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Lion (2008−2009) | Pinetrail (2009−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,695 | 1,707 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon X2 QL-66 uses the S1g2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom D525 uses FCBGA559 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Athlon X2 QL-66 versus DDR3-800 on the Atom D525 — the Atom D525 supports 19.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X2 QL-66 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Athlon X2 QL-66) vs 1 (Atom D525). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD S1 (Athlon X2 QL-66) and Intel NM10 (Atom D525).
| Feature | Athlon X2 QL-66 | Atom D525 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | S1g2 | FCBGA559 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | DDR3-800+20% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
The Atom D525 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3150), while the Athlon X2 QL-66 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Athlon X2 QL-66 | Atom D525 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel GMA 3150 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon X2 QL-66 was priced at $150, while the Atom D525 came in at $63. On launch pricing ($150 vs $63), Atom D525 was $87 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X2 QL-66 delivers 11.3 pts/$ vs 27.1 pts/$ for the Atom D525 — making the Atom D525 the 82.3% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon X2 QL-66 | Atom D525 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $63-58% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.3 | 27.1+140% |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















