Athlon X4 845 vs PRO A10-8850B

Athlon X4 845 vs PRO A10-8850B Performance Spectrum

Athlon X4 845

4 / 4

3,768

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

PRO A10-8850B

4 / 4

3,752

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X4 845 vs PRO A10-8850B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X4 845 vs PRO A10-8850B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X4 845

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $70 MSRP, while PRO A10-8850B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

PRO A10-8850B

2015

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,752 vs 3,768).
❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon X4 845 better than PRO A10-8850B?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, PRO A10-8850B is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon X4 845 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon X4 845 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon X4 845 is the better buy right now. Athlon X4 845 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $70 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that PRO A10-8850B is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (53.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon X4 845 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon X4 845 vs PRO A10-8850B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X4 845

The Athlon X4 845 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,768 points. Launch price was $149.

PRO A10-8850B

The PRO A10-8850B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,752 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon X4 845 and PRO A10-8850B share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Athlon X4 845 versus 4.1 GHz on the PRO A10-8850B — a 7.6% clock advantage for the PRO A10-8850B (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Athlon X4 845 uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the PRO A10-8850B uses Godaveri (2014−2016) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 845 scores 3,768 against the PRO A10-8850B's 3,752 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon X4 845.

Feature	Athlon X4 845	PRO A10-8850B
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz	4.1 GHz+8%
Base Clock	3.5 GHz	3.9 GHz+11%
L2 Cache	2 MB	4096 kB+100%
Process	28 nm	28 nm
Architecture	Carrizo (2015−2018)	Godaveri (2014−2016)
PassMark	3,768	3,752