
Athlon X4 845

Ryzen Embedded R1505G
Athlon X4 845 vs Ryzen Embedded R1505G Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon X4 845 vs Ryzen Embedded R1505G FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon X4 845 vs Ryzen Embedded R1505G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon X4 845
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($70 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 13.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.8 vs 47.5 PassMark/$ ($70 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,768 vs 3,799).
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen Embedded R1505G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen Embedded R1505G
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 3, while Athlon X4 845 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon X4 845 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 47.5 vs 53.8 PassMark/$ ($80 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Embedded R1505G better than Athlon X4 845?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon X4 845 vs Ryzen Embedded R1505G Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon X4 845
The Athlon X4 845 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,768 points. Launch price was $149.


Ryzen Embedded R1505G
The Ryzen Embedded R1505G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,799 points. Launch price was $80.
Processing Power
The Athlon X4 845 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded R1505G offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon X4 845 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Athlon X4 845 versus 3.3 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R1505G — a 14.1% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 845 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Athlon X4 845 uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R1505G uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 845 scores 3,768 against the Ryzen Embedded R1505G's 3,799 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen Embedded R1505G.
| Feature | Athlon X4 845 | Ryzen Embedded R1505G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+15% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+46% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm | 14 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Carrizo (2015−2018) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 3,768 | 3,799 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon X4 845 uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R1505G uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-2133 on the Athlon X4 845 versus DDR4-2400 on the Ryzen Embedded R1505G — the Ryzen Embedded R1505G supports 12.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X4 845 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 8 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Athlon X4 845 | Ryzen Embedded R1505G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2+ | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-2133 | DDR4-2400+13% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+100% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 8 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon X4 845) / AMD-V (Ryzen Embedded R1505G). The Ryzen Embedded R1505G includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 3), while the Athlon X4 845 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen Embedded R1505G targets Embedded.
| Feature | Athlon X4 845 | Ryzen Embedded R1505G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Vega 3 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Embedded |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon X4 845 was priced at $70, while the Ryzen Embedded R1505G came in at $80. On launch pricing ($70 vs $80), Athlon X4 845 was $10 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon X4 845 delivers 53.8 pts/$ vs 47.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded R1505G — making the Athlon X4 845 the 12.5% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon X4 845 | Ryzen Embedded R1505G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $70-13% | $80 |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.8+13% | 47.5 |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














