Athlon XP 1600+
VS
Atom Z520

Athlon XP 1600+ vs Atom Z520

AMD

Athlon XP 1600+

1 Cores1 Thrd63 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2001
VS
Intel

Atom Z520

1 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 0.03 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon XP 1600+ is positioned at rank 1114 and the Atom Z520 is on rank 523, so the Atom Z520 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon XP 1600+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
249372%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
235632%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
171088%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
51542%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
40826%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
35715%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
20456%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
20189%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
18382%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
18381%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
18175%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
17685%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
17438%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
17367%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
17210%
#1113
Pentium 4 2.80
MSRP: $327|Avg: $25
100%
#1114
Athlon XP 1600+
MSRP: $160|Avg: $15
100%
#1115
Athlon 64 3400+
MSRP: $440|Avg: $20
99%
#1116
Pentium 4 2.26
MSRP: $241|Avg: $20
98%
#1117
Athlon 64 3200+
MSRP: $417|Avg: $10
97%
#1118
Athlon 64 FX-60
MSRP: $1031|Avg: $1000
94%
#1119
Pentium Extreme Edition 965
MSRP: $999|Avg: $100
94%
#1120
Athlon XP 2200+
MSRP: $241|Avg: $30
93%
#1121
Athlon XP 1700+
MSRP: $190|Avg: $15
90%
#1122
Pentium Extreme Edition 955
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
88%
#1123
Athlon XP 2700+
MSRP: $349|Avg: $20
82%
#1124
Athlon XP 2800+
MSRP: $375|Avg: $35
81%
#1125
Pentium III 1200
MSRP: $200|Avg: $10
78%
#1126
Athlon XP 3200+
MSRP: $464|Avg: $40
77%
#1127
Pentium 4 2.60
MSRP: $401|Avg: $25
73%
#1128
Pentium III 1400S
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
73%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom Z520

#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
98%
#511
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
682%
#512
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
672%
#513
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
617%
#514
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
614%
#515
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
609%
#517
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
588%
#518
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
564%
#519
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
563%
#520
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
548%
#523
Atom Z520
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom Z520 (2008) utilizes 45 nm technology and modern memory, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAthlon XP 1600+Atom Z520
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Thoroughbred (2001−2002) / 180 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Silverthorne (2008−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon XP 1600+ (2001) relies on 180 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAthlon XP 1600+Atom Z520
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon XP 1600+ and Atom Z520

AMD

Athlon XP 1600+

The Athlon XP 1600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thoroughbred (2001−2002) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 180 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 63 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 200 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Atom Z520

The Atom Z520 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Silverthorne (2008−2010) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 0.03 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PBGA441. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 215 points. Launch price was $65.

Processing Power

The Athlon XP 1600+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, matching the Atom Z520's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Athlon XP 1600+ versus 0.03 GHz on the Atom Z520 — a 191.6% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 1600+. The Athlon XP 1600+ uses the Thoroughbred (2001−2002) architecture (180 nm), while the Atom Z520 uses Silverthorne (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 1600+ scores 200 against the Atom Z520's 215 — a 7.2% lead for the Atom Z520. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAthlon XP 1600+Atom Z520
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 2
Boost Clock
1.4 GHz+4567%
0.03 GHz
Base Clock
1.33 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB
512 kB+100%
Process
180 nm
45 nm-75%
Architecture
Thoroughbred (2001−2002)
Silverthorne (2008−2010)
PassMark
200
215+8%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon XP 1600+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Atom Z520 uses PBGA441 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-266 on the Athlon XP 1600+ versus DDR2-533 on the Atom Z520 — the Atom Z520 supports -203% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 2 GB of RAM. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: Socket A (Athlon XP 1600+) and Intel US15W (Atom Z520).

FeatureAthlon XP 1600+Atom Z520
Socket
A
PBGA441
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR-266
DDR2-533
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
RAM Channels
1
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: false (Athlon XP 1600+) vs VT-x (Atom Z520). Primary use case: Atom Z520 targets Mobile.

FeatureAthlon XP 1600+Atom Z520
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
false
VT-x
Target Use
Mobile