Athlon XP 1600+ vs Pentium III 1266S

AMD

Athlon XP 1600+

1 Cores1 Thrd63 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2001
Similar parts
······
VS
Intel

Pentium III 1266S

1 Cores1 Thrd30 WWMax: 1.27 GHz2001
Similar parts
·······

Athlon XP 1600+ vs Pentium III 1266S Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon XP 1600+ vs Pentium III 1266S FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon XP 1600+ vs Pentium III 1266S: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon XP 1600+

2001

Why buy it

  • Costs $209 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $369 MSRP).
  • Delivers 119.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 1.3 vs 0.6 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $369 MSRP).
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Pentium III 1266S.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (200 vs 210).
  • 110% higher power demand at 63W vs 30W.

Pentium III 1266S

2001

Why buy it

  • +5% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 30W instead of 63W, a 33W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 0.6 vs 1.3 PassMark/$ ($369 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon XP 1600+.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium III 1266S better than Athlon XP 1600+?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon XP 1600+ is ahead with 10.2% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium III 1266S pulls ahead with 5% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium III 1266S is the stronger fit. You are getting 5% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Pentium III 1266S is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium III 1266S comes in 130.6% more expensive on MSRP at $369 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it still gives you 5% better PassMark. Athlon XP 1600+ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2001 platform. Even with 119.6% better value on paper (1.3 vs 0.6 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on A.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pentium III 1266S makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon XP 1600+ vs Pentium III 1266S Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon XP 1600+

The Athlon XP 1600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thoroughbred (2001−2002) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 180 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 63 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 200 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Pentium III 1266S

The Pentium III 1266S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Tualatin (2000−2002) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.27 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA370. Thermal design power (TDP): 30 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 210 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon XP 1600+ and Pentium III 1266S share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Athlon XP 1600+ versus 1.27 GHz on the Pentium III 1266S — a 9.7% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 1600+. The Athlon XP 1600+ uses the Thoroughbred (2001−2002) architecture (180 nm), while the Pentium III 1266S uses Tualatin (2000−2002) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 1600+ scores 200 against the Pentium III 1266S's 210 — a 4.9% lead for the Pentium III 1266S. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAthlon XP 1600+Pentium III 1266S
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.4 GHz+10%
1.27 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB
512 kB+100%
Process
180 nm
130 nm-28%
Architecture
Thoroughbred (2001−2002)
Tualatin (2000−2002)
PassMark
200
210+5%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon XP 1600+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium III 1266S uses PGA370 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon XP 1600+Pentium III 1266S
Socket
A
PGA370
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR-266
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
No
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: false (Athlon XP 1600+) / not specified (Pentium III 1266S).

FeatureAthlon XP 1600+Pentium III 1266S
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
false
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon XP 1600+ was priced at $160, while the Pentium III 1266S came in at $369. On launch pricing ($160 vs $369), Athlon XP 1600+ was $209 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon XP 1600+ delivers 1.3 pts/$ vs 0.6 pts/$ for the Pentium III 1266S — making the Athlon XP 1600+ the 74.9% better value option.

FeatureAthlon XP 1600+Pentium III 1266S
MSRP
$160-57%
$369
Performance per Dollar
1.3+117%
0.6
Release Date
2001
2001

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.