Athlon XP 1600+ vs Pentium 4 1.80

AMD

Athlon XP 1600+

1 Cores1 Thrd63 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2001
Similar parts
······
VS
Intel

Pentium 4 1.80

1 Cores1 Thrd67 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2001
Similar parts
·······

Athlon XP 1600+ vs Pentium 4 1.80 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon XP 1600+ vs Pentium 4 1.80 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon XP 1600+ vs Pentium 4 1.80: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon XP 1600+

2001

Why buy it

  • Costs $402 less on MSRP ($160 MSRP vs $562 MSRP).
  • Delivers 212.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 1.3 vs 0.4 PassMark/$ ($160 MSRP vs $562 MSRP).
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Pentium 4 1.80.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium 4 1.80 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (200 vs 225).

Pentium 4 1.80

2001

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +20.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 1.3 PassMark/$ ($562 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon XP 1600+.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium 4 1.80 better than Athlon XP 1600+?
Yes. Pentium 4 1.80 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 20.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 12.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Pentium 4 1.80 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 20.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium 4 1.80 is the stronger fit. You are getting 12.5% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Pentium 4 1.80 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium 4 1.80 comes in 251.3% more expensive on MSRP at $562 MSRP versus $160 MSRP, and it still gives you a 20.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon XP 1600+ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2001 platform. Even with 212.2% better value on paper (1.3 vs 0.4 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on A.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pentium 4 1.80 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon XP 1600+ vs Pentium 4 1.80 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon XP 1600+

The Athlon XP 1600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thoroughbred (2001−2002) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 180 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 63 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 200 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Pentium 4 1.80

The Pentium 4 1.80 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 180 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 67 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 225 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon XP 1600+ and Pentium 4 1.80 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.4 GHz on the Athlon XP 1600+ versus 1.8 GHz on the Pentium 4 1.80 — a 25% clock advantage for the Pentium 4 1.80. The Athlon XP 1600+ uses the Thoroughbred (2001−2002) architecture (180 nm), while the Pentium 4 1.80 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (180 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 1600+ scores 200 against the Pentium 4 1.80's 225 — a 11.8% lead for the Pentium 4 1.80. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAthlon XP 1600+Pentium 4 1.80
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.4 GHz
1.8 GHz+29%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB
256 kB
Process
180 nm
180 nm
Architecture
Thoroughbred (2001−2002)
NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark
200
225+13%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon XP 1600+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium 4 1.80 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon XP 1600+Pentium 4 1.80
Socket
A
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR-266
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
No
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: false (Athlon XP 1600+) / not specified (Pentium 4 1.80).

FeatureAthlon XP 1600+Pentium 4 1.80
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
false
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon XP 1600+ was priced at $160, while the Pentium 4 1.80 came in at $562. On launch pricing ($160 vs $562), Athlon XP 1600+ was $402 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon XP 1600+ delivers 1.3 pts/$ vs 0.4 pts/$ for the Pentium 4 1.80 — making the Athlon XP 1600+ the 103% better value option.

FeatureAthlon XP 1600+Pentium 4 1.80
MSRP
$160-72%
$562
Performance per Dollar
1.3+225%
0.4
Release Date
2001
2001

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.