Athlon XP 1700+ vs Athlon XP 1900+

AMD

Athlon XP 1700+

1 Cores1 Thrd64 WWMax: 1.47 GHz2001
Similar parts
······
VS
AMD

Athlon XP 1900+

1 Cores1 Thrd68 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2001
Similar parts
·······

Athlon XP 1700+ vs Athlon XP 1900+ Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon XP 1700+ vs Athlon XP 1900+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon XP 1700+ vs Athlon XP 1900+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon XP 1700+

2001

Why buy it

  • Costs $79 less on MSRP ($190 MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
  • Delivers 26.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 1.1 vs 0.9 PassMark/$ ($190 MSRP vs $269 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon XP 1900+ across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (212 vs 238).

Athlon XP 1900+

2001

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +20.0% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 1.1 PassMark/$ ($269 MSRP vs $190 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon XP 1900+ better than Athlon XP 1700+?
Yes. Athlon XP 1900+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 20.0% average FPS lead across 46 shared CPU game tests in our data, 12.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Athlon XP 1900+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 20.0% more average FPS across 46 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon XP 1900+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 12.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Athlon XP 1900+ is still the much better call for a fresh build. Athlon XP 1900+ comes in 41.6% more expensive on MSRP at $269 MSRP versus $190 MSRP, and it still gives you a 20.0% average FPS lead across 46 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon XP 1700+ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2001 platform. Even with 26.1% better value on paper (1.1 vs 0.9 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on A.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon XP 1900+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon XP 1700+ vs Athlon XP 1900+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon XP 1700+

The Athlon XP 1700+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thoroughbred (2001−2002) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.47 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 180 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 64 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 212 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Athlon XP 1900+

The Athlon XP 1900+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thoroughbred (2001−2002) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 180 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 68 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 238 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon XP 1700+ and Athlon XP 1900+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.47 GHz on the Athlon XP 1700+ versus 1.6 GHz on the Athlon XP 1900+ — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 1900+. Both are built on the Thoroughbred (2001−2002) architecture using a 180 nm process. In PassMark, the Athlon XP 1700+ scores 212 against the Athlon XP 1900+'s 238 — a 11.6% lead for the Athlon XP 1900+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAthlon XP 1700+Athlon XP 1900+
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.47 GHz
1.6 GHz+9%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB
256 kB
Process
180 nm
180 nm
Architecture
Thoroughbred (2001−2002)
Thoroughbred (2001−2002)
PassMark
212
238+12%
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the A socket with PCIe 1.1. Both support up to DDR-266 memory speed. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD Socket A (Athlon XP 1700+) and AMD Socket A (Athlon XP 1900+).

FeatureAthlon XP 1700+Athlon XP 1900+
Socket
A
A
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR-266
DDR-266
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
RAM Channels
1
1
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
0
0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon XP 1700+ was priced at $190, while the Athlon XP 1900+ came in at $269. On launch pricing ($190 vs $269), Athlon XP 1700+ was $79 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon XP 1700+ delivers 1.1 pts/$ vs 0.9 pts/$ for the Athlon XP 1900+ — making the Athlon XP 1700+ the 23.1% better value option.

FeatureAthlon XP 1700+Athlon XP 1900+
MSRP
$190-29%
$269
Performance per Dollar
1.1+22%
0.9
Release Date
2001
2001

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.