Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Athlon XP 1700+ vs Z-01

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

Athlon XP 1700+

1 Cores1 Thrd64 WWMax: 1.47 GHz2001
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Z-01

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 1 GHz2011
Buy on Amazon

Athlon XP 1700+ vs Z-01 Performance Spectrum

Athlon XP 1700+
1 / 1
212
0.0%
brand logoAthlon XP 1500+
brand logoRyzen 7 4700GE
brand logoRyzen 9 5900X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7970X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7980X
Z-01
2 / 2
215
+1.4%
brand logoAthlon XP 1500+
brand logoRyzen 7 4700GE
brand logoRyzen 9 5900X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7970X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 7980X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon XP 1700+ vs Z-01: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon XP 1700+

2001

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Lower PassMark (212 vs 215).
    • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 1.1 vs 4.3 PassMark/$ ($190 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
    • ❌966.7% higher power demand at 64W vs 6W.
    • ❌No integrated graphics, while Z-01 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

    Z-01

    2011

    Why buy it

    • ✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
    • ✅Costs $140 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $190 MSRP).
    • ✅Delivers 285.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 4.3 vs 1.1 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $190 MSRP).
    • ✅Draws 6W instead of 64W, a 58W reduction.
    • ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Z-01 better than Athlon XP 1700+?
    It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon XP 1700+ is ahead with 47% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Z-01 pulls ahead with 1.4% better PassMark.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Z-01 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Z-01 is the better buy right now. Z-01 comes in $140 cheaper on MSRP at $50 MSRP versus $190 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Athlon XP 1700+ is still the better pure gaming CPU with 47% higher max boost clock. It is also 285.4% better value on MSRP (4.3 vs 1.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Z-01 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2001) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Athlon XP 1700+ vs Z-01 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Athlon XP 1700+

    The Athlon XP 1700+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thoroughbred (2001−2002) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.47 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 180 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 64 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 212 points. Launch price was $149.

    AMD

    Z-01

    The Z-01 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Desna (2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 215 points. Launch price was $69.

    ⚡

    Processing Power

    The Athlon XP 1700+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Z-01 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Z-01 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.47 GHz on the Athlon XP 1700+ versus 1 GHz on the Z-01 — a 38.1% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 1700+. The Athlon XP 1700+ uses the Thoroughbred (2001−2002) architecture (180 nm), while the Z-01 uses Desna (2011) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 1700+ scores 212 against the Z-01's 215 — a 1.4% lead for the Z-01. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeatureAthlon XP 1700+Z-01
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    2 / 2+100%
    Boost Clock
    1.47 GHz+47%
    1 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    256 kB
    1 MB+300%
    Process
    180 nm
    40 nm-78%
    Architecture
    Thoroughbred (2001−2002)
    Desna (2011)
    PassMark
    212
    215+1%
    Geekbench 6 Single
    —
    100
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    —
    180
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Athlon XP 1700+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Z-01 uses FT1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-266 on the Athlon XP 1700+ versus DDR3-1066 on the Z-01 — the Z-01 supports -500.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon XP 1700+) vs 4 (Z-01) — the Z-01 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD Socket A (Athlon XP 1700+) and Desna (Z-01).

    FeatureAthlon XP 1700+Z-01
    Socket
    A
    FT1
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 2.0+82%
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR-266
    DDR3-1066
    Max RAM Capacity
    4 GB
    4 GB
    RAM Channels
    1
    1
    ECC Support
    Yes
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    0
    4
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: not specified (Athlon XP 1700+) / AMD-V (Z-01). The Z-01 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6250), while the Athlon XP 1700+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Z-01 targets Tablet/Netbook.

    FeatureAthlon XP 1700+Z-01
    Integrated GPU
    No
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    —
    Radeon HD 6250
    Unlocked
    —
    No
    AVX-512
    —
    No
    Virtualization
    —
    AMD-V
    Target Use
    —
    Tablet/Netbook
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the Athlon XP 1700+ was priced at $190, while the Z-01 came in at $50. On launch pricing ($190 vs $50), Z-01 was $140 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon XP 1700+ delivers 1.1 pts/$ vs 4.3 pts/$ for the Z-01 — making the Z-01 the 117.6% better value option.

    FeatureAthlon XP 1700+Z-01
    MSRP
    $190
    $50-74%
    Performance per Dollar
    1.1
    4.3+291%
    Release Date
    2001
    2011
    Search Athlon XP 1700+ on AmazonSearch Z-01 on Amazon

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.