Athlon XP 1700+ vs Pentium 4 1.80

Athlon XP 1700+ vs Pentium 4 1.80 Performance Spectrum

Athlon XP 1700+

1 / 1

212

0.0%

Athlon XP 1500+

Ryzen 7 4700GE

Ryzen 9 5900X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Pentium 4 1.80

1 / 1

225

+6.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon XP 1700+ vs Pentium 4 1.80 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon XP 1700+ vs Pentium 4 1.80: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon XP 1700+

2001

Why buy it

✅Costs $372 less on MSRP ($190 MSRP vs $562 MSRP).
✅Delivers 178.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 1.1 vs 0.4 PassMark/$ ($190 MSRP vs $562 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium 4 1.80 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (212 vs 225).

Pentium 4 1.80

2001

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +20.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 1.1 PassMark/$ ($562 MSRP vs $190 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium 4 1.80 better than Athlon XP 1700+?

Yes. Pentium 4 1.80 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 20.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 6.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium 4 1.80 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 20.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium 4 1.80 is the stronger fit. You are getting 6.1% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium 4 1.80 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium 4 1.80 comes in 195.8% more expensive on MSRP at $562 MSRP versus $190 MSRP, and it still gives you a 20.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon XP 1700+ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2001 platform. Even with 178.7% better value on paper (1.1 vs 0.4 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on A.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium 4 1.80 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon XP 1700+ vs Pentium 4 1.80 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon XP 1700+

The Athlon XP 1700+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thoroughbred (2001−2002) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.47 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 180 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 64 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 212 points. Launch price was $149.

Pentium 4 1.80

The Pentium 4 1.80 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 180 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 67 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 225 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon XP 1700+ and Pentium 4 1.80 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.47 GHz on the Athlon XP 1700+ versus 1.8 GHz on the Pentium 4 1.80 — a 20.2% clock advantage for the Pentium 4 1.80. The Athlon XP 1700+ uses the Thoroughbred (2001−2002) architecture (180 nm), while the Pentium 4 1.80 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (180 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 1700+ scores 212 against the Pentium 4 1.80's 225 — a 5.9% lead for the Pentium 4 1.80. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon XP 1700+	Pentium 4 1.80
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.47 GHz	1.8 GHz+22%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB	256 kB
Process	180 nm	180 nm
Architecture	Thoroughbred (2001−2002)	NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark	212	225+6%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon XP 1700+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium 4 1.80 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon XP 1700+	Pentium 4 1.80
Socket	A	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR-266	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon XP 1700+ was priced at $190, while the Pentium 4 1.80 came in at $562. On launch pricing ($190 vs $562), Athlon XP 1700+ was $372 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon XP 1700+ delivers 1.1 pts/$ vs 0.4 pts/$ for the Pentium 4 1.80 — making the Athlon XP 1700+ the 94.4% better value option.

Feature	Athlon XP 1700+	Pentium 4 1.80
MSRP	$190-66%	$562
Performance per Dollar	1.1+175%	0.4
Release Date	2001	2001

Search Athlon XP 1700+ on Amazon

Search Pentium 4 1.80 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.