Athlon XP 1700+ vs Core i5-13400F

AMD

Athlon XP 1700+

1 Cores1 Thrd64 WWMax: 1.47 GHz2001
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023
Core family
·······

Athlon XP 1700+ vs Core i5-13400F Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon XP 1700+ vs Core i5-13400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon XP 1700+ vs Core i5-13400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon XP 1700+

2001

Why buy it

  • Costs $6 less on MSRP ($190 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (212 vs 25,029).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 1.1 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($190 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
  • Older platform position on A, while Core i5-13400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +4013.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Delivers 11344.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 1.1 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $190 MSRP).
  • Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of A and older memory support.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Athlon XP 1700+.

Trade-offs

  • 3.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $196 MSRPvs$190 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Athlon XP 1700+?
Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4013.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 11706.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4013.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 11706.1% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-13400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400F comes in 3.2% more expensive on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $190 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4013.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 11344.7% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 1.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13400F makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2001), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of A, and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 1/1. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Athlon XP 1700+ vs Core i5-13400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon XP 1700+

The Athlon XP 1700+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Thoroughbred (2001−2002) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.47 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 180 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 64 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 212 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Processing Power

The Athlon XP 1700+ packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 9 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.47 GHz on the Athlon XP 1700+ versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 103.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F. The Athlon XP 1700+ uses the Thoroughbred (2001−2002) architecture (180 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 1700+ scores 212 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 196.6% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon XP 1700+ vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.

FeatureAthlon XP 1700+Core i5-13400F
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
10 / 16+900%
Boost Clock
1.47 GHz
4.6 GHz+213%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
20 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB
1.25 MB (per core)+400%
Process
180 nm
Intel 7 nm-96%
Architecture
Thoroughbred (2001−2002)
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark
212
25,029+11706%
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,211
Geekbench 6 Single
2,407
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,408
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon XP 1700+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-266 on the Athlon XP 1700+ versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the Core i5-13400F supports -1904.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 4700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Athlon XP 1700+) vs 2 (Core i5-13400F). PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon XP 1700+) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Core i5-13400F offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD Socket A (Athlon XP 1700+) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).

FeatureAthlon XP 1700+Core i5-13400F
Socket
A
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 5.0+355%
Max RAM Speed
DDR-266
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
192 GB+4700%
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
Yes
No
PCIe Lanes
0
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Athlon XP 1700+) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

FeatureAthlon XP 1700+Core i5-13400F
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon XP 1700+ was priced at $190, while the Core i5-13400F came in at $196. On launch pricing ($190 vs $196), Athlon XP 1700+ was $6 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon XP 1700+ delivers 1.1 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 196.5% better value option.

FeatureAthlon XP 1700+Core i5-13400F
MSRP
$190-3%
$196
Performance per Dollar
1.1
127.7+11509%
Release Date
2001
2023

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.