CPU
GPU
Athlon XP 3200+
Celeron 430
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon XP 3200+ is positioned at rank 1127 and the Celeron 430 is on rank 1010, so the Celeron 430 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon XP 3200+
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 430
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon XP 3200+ | Celeron 430 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($40) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Barton (2001−2004) / 130 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Conroe-L (2007−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon XP 3200+ | Celeron 430 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+303%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($40) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon XP 3200+ and Celeron 430
Athlon XP 3200+
The Athlon XP 3200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Barton (2001−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 445 points. Launch price was $149.
Celeron 430
The Celeron 430 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 448 points. Launch price was $50.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon XP 3200+ and Celeron 430 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Athlon XP 3200+ versus 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 430 — a 20% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 3200+. The Athlon XP 3200+ uses the Barton (2001−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Celeron 430 uses Conroe-L (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 3200+ scores 445 against the Celeron 430's 448 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron 430. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon XP 3200+ | Celeron 430 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz+22% | 1.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 512 kB |
| Process | 130 nm | 65 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Barton (2001−2004) | Conroe-L (2007−2008) |
| PassMark | 445 | 448 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 226 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon XP 3200+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron 430 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-400 on the Athlon XP 3200+ versus DDR2-800 on the Celeron 430 — the Celeron 430 supports -202% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (Athlon XP 3200+) vs 2 (Celeron 430). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD Socket A (Athlon XP 3200+) and 945,G31,G41 (Celeron 430).
| Feature | Athlon XP 3200+ | Celeron 430 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | A | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR-400 | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Athlon XP 3200+) / No (Celeron 430). Primary use case: Celeron 430 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 430 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.
| Feature | Athlon XP 3200+ | Celeron 430 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | No |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Athlon XP 3200+ launched at $464 MSRP, while the Celeron 430 debuted at $49. At current prices ($40 vs $10), the Celeron 430 is $30 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon XP 3200+ delivers 11.1 pts/$ vs 44.8 pts/$ for the Celeron 430 — making the Celeron 430 the 120.4% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon XP 3200+ | Celeron 430 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $464 | $49-89% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $10-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.1 | 44.8+304% |
| Release Date | 2001 | 2007 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon XP 3200+ and Celeron 430
