Athlon XP 3200+ vs Pentium M 745

Athlon XP 3200+ vs Pentium M 745 Performance Spectrum

Athlon XP 3200+

1 / 1

445

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium M 745

1 / 1

465

+4.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon XP 3200+ vs Pentium M 745 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon XP 3200+ vs Pentium M 745: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon XP 3200+

2001

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Pentium M 745 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (445 vs 465).
❌Launch MSRP is still $464 MSRP, while Pentium M 745 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌266.7% higher power demand at 77W vs 21W.

Pentium M 745

2004

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 21W instead of 77W, a 56W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium M 745 better than Athlon XP 3200+?

Yes. Pentium M 745 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 4.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium M 745 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 745 is the stronger fit. You are getting 4.5% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium M 745 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium M 745 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $464 MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon XP 3200+ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2001 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (1.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on A.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium M 745 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2004 vs 2001) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon XP 3200+ vs Pentium M 745 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon XP 3200+

The Athlon XP 3200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Barton (2001−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: A. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 445 points. Launch price was $149.

Pentium M 745

The Pentium M 745 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 465 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon XP 3200+ and Pentium M 745 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Athlon XP 3200+ versus 1.8 GHz on the Pentium M 745 — a 20% clock advantage for the Athlon XP 3200+. The Athlon XP 3200+ uses the Barton (2001−2004) architecture (130 nm), while the Pentium M 745 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon XP 3200+ scores 445 against the Pentium M 745's 465 — a 4.4% lead for the Pentium M 745. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon XP 3200+	Pentium M 745
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz+22%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	2 MB+300%
Process	130 nm	90 nm-31%
Architecture	Barton (2001−2004)	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	445	465+4%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	100
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	100

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon XP 3200+ uses the A socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium M 745 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR-400 on the Athlon XP 3200+ versus DDR2 on the Pentium M 745 — the Pentium M 745 supports -100.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon XP 3200+ supports up to 4 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD Socket A (Athlon XP 3200+) and Intel 855GME,Intel 855PM (Pentium M 745).