
Atom C3808

Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Atom C3808 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Atom C3808 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Civilization VI
Atom C3808 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Atom C3808
2017Why buy it
- β Draws 25W instead of 120W, a 95W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7800X3D across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (5,671 vs 34,293).
- βOlder platform position on FCBGA1310 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7800X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
2023Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +133.0% higher average FPS across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1310 and DDR4.
- β 133.3% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core), while Atom C3808 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $449 MSRP, while Atom C3808 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β380% higher power demand at 120W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7800X3D better than Atom C3808?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom C3808 vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom C3808
The Atom C3808 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016β2017) architecture. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2133. Passmark benchmark score: 5,671 points. Launch price was $369.


Ryzen 7 7800X3D
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 34,293 points. Launch price was $449.
Processing Power
The Atom C3808 packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 8 cores / 16 threads β the Atom C3808 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Atom C3808 versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D β a 85.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D (base: 2 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The Atom C3808 uses the Goldmont (2016β2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3808 scores 5,671 against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D's 34,293 β a 143.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. L3 cache: 12 MB on the Atom C3808 vs 96 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.
| Feature | Atom C3808 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 12+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 5 GHz+150% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 4.4 GHz+120% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB | 96 MB (total)+700% |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+1100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 5 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Goldmont (2016β2017) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) |
| PassMark | 5,671 | 34,293+505% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 18,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 2,700 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 15,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom C3808 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 7800X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Atom C3808 versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D β the Ryzen 7 7800X3D supports 143.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3808 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB β 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Atom C3808) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D) β the Ryzen 7 7800X3D offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1310 (Atom C3808) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 7800X3D).
| Feature | Atom C3808 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1310 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | DDR5-5200+144% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+100% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | 28+133% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Atom C3808) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7800X3D). The Ryzen 7 7800X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core)), while the Atom C3808 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7800X3D targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7800X3D rivals Intel Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | Atom C3808 | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | β | AMD Radeon Graphics (2-core) |
| Unlocked | β | Yes |
| AVX-512 | β | Yes |
| Virtualization | β | AMD-V |
| Target Use | β | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













