Atom C3808 vs Xeon E3-1280

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom C3808 is positioned at rank 737 and the Xeon E3-1280 is on rank 517, so the Xeon E3-1280 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom C3808

#1

Xeon Platinum 8454H

MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A

14472%

#6

Xeon Gold 6240R

MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A

2733%

#10

Xeon 6337P

MSRP: $60|Avg: $5

2428%

#15

EPYC 9174F

MSRP: $194|Avg: $30

1875%

#428

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9879.97

100%

#429

EPYC 7552

MSRP: $4025|Avg: $1650

99%

#431

Xeon Platinum 8360Y

MSRP: $5383|Avg: N/A

99%

#432

Xeon W-3245

MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1200

98%

#433

Xeon Gold 6346

MSRP: $2708|Avg: $2195

97%

#434

Xeon W-3225

MSRP: $1319|Avg: $850

96%

#736

Xeon E3-1245 v3

MSRP: $490|Avg: $490

100%

#737

Atom C3808

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#746

Xeon E5-2403 v2

MSRP: $192|Avg: $61

97%

#747

Xeon E3-1285 v4

MSRP: $556|Avg: $200

97%

#749

Xeon E3-1260L

MSRP: $294|Avg: $270

97%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1280

#1

Xeon Platinum 8454H

MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A

7406%

#6

Xeon Gold 6240R

MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A

1398%

#10

Xeon 6337P

MSRP: $60|Avg: $5

1242%

#15

EPYC 9174F

MSRP: $194|Avg: $30

960%

#318

EPYC 7343

MSRP: $1565|Avg: $1350

99%

#319

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

MSRP: $2399|Avg: $225

99%

#320

EPYC 7413

MSRP: $1825|Avg: $450

99%

#321

Xeon W-3335

MSRP: $1430|Avg: $1200

98%

#322

EPYC 9354P

MSRP: $2730|Avg: $2205

98%

#323

EPYC 9224

MSRP: $1825|Avg: $1199

95%

#324

Xeon Gold 6423N

MSRP: $2161|Avg: $2161

95%

#325

Xeon w7-3565X

MSRP: $2689|Avg: $2850

94%

#517

Xeon E3-1280

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom C3808 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4: 2133, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Atom C3808	Xeon E3-1280
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing
Longevity	✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E3-1280 (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Atom C3808	Xeon E3-1280
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Atom C3808 Benchmark Check

Xeon E3-1280 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom C3808 and Xeon E3-1280

Atom C3808

The Atom C3808 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. L2 cache: 12 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2133. Passmark benchmark score: 5,671 points. Launch price was $369.

Xeon E3-1280

The Xeon E3-1280 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,612 points. Launch price was $450.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom C3808 packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E3-1280 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Atom C3808 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Atom C3808 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E3-1280 — a 64.4% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1280 (base: 2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Atom C3808 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1280 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3808 scores 5,671 against the Xeon E3-1280's 5,612 — a 1% lead for the Atom C3808. L3 cache: 12 MB on the Atom C3808 vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1280.

Feature	Atom C3808	Xeon E3-1280
Cores / Threads	12 / 12+200%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	2 GHz	3.9 GHz+95%
Base Clock	2 GHz	3.5 GHz+75%
L3 Cache	12 MB+50%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	12 MB+4700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Goldmont (2016−2017)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	5,671+1%	5,612

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom C3808 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1280 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Atom C3808	Xeon E3-1280
Socket	FCBGA1310	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	✅	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—