
Atom D525

Celeron G1820
Atom D525 vs Celeron G1820 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Atom D525 vs Celeron G1820 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Atom D525 vs Celeron G1820: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Atom D525
2010Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $47 less on MSRP ($63 MSRP vs $110 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 75.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.1 vs 15.4 PassMark/$ ($63 MSRP vs $110 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 13W instead of 54W, a 41W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Celeron G1820
2013Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,696 vs 1,707).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.4 vs 27.1 PassMark/$ ($110 MSRP vs $63 MSRP).
- ❌315.4% higher power demand at 54W vs 13W.
Quick Answers
So, is Atom D525 better than Celeron G1820?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom D525 vs Celeron G1820 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom D525
The Atom D525 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Pinetrail (2009−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,707 points. Launch price was $63.

Celeron G1820
The Celeron G1820 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,696 points. Launch price was $110.
Processing Power
The Atom D525 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron G1820's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.83 GHz on the Atom D525 versus 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G1820 — a 38.4% clock advantage for the Celeron G1820 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Atom D525 uses the Pinetrail (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron G1820 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom D525 scores 1,707 against the Celeron G1820's 1,696 — a 0.6% lead for the Atom D525. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom D525 vs 2 MB on the Celeron G1820.
| Feature | Atom D525 | Celeron G1820 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.83 GHz | 2.7 GHz+48% |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2.7 GHz+50% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 22 nm-51% |
| Architecture | Pinetrail (2009−2011) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 1,707 | 1,696 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 496 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 910 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom D525 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G1820 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-800 on the Atom D525 versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1820 — the Celeron G1820 supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G1820 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom D525) vs 2 (Celeron G1820). PCIe lanes: 0 (Atom D525) vs 16 (Celeron G1820) — the Celeron G1820 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel NM10 (Atom D525) and H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Celeron G1820).
| Feature | Atom D525 | Celeron G1820 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA559 | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-800 | DDR3-1333+67% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 32 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Atom D525) / VT-x (Celeron G1820). Both include integrated graphics — Intel GMA 3150 (Atom D525) and HD Graphics (Haswell) (Celeron G1820) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1820 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1820 rivals Pentium G3220.
| Feature | Atom D525 | Celeron G1820 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel GMA 3150 | HD Graphics (Haswell) |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Atom D525 was priced at $63, while the Celeron G1820 came in at $110. On launch pricing ($63 vs $110), Atom D525 was $47 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Atom D525 delivers 27.1 pts/$ vs 15.4 pts/$ for the Celeron G1820 — making the Atom D525 the 54.9% better value option.
| Feature | Atom D525 | Celeron G1820 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $63-43% | $110 |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.1+76% | 15.4 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














