Atom E3815 vs Athlon MP 2800+

Atom E3815

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.47 GHz2013

Athlon MP 2800+

1 Cores1 Thrd60 WWMax: 2.13 GHz2003

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Atom E3815

1 / 1

365

0.0%

380

+4.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom E3815 is positioned at rank 1103 and the Athlon MP 2800+ is on rank 1026, so the Athlon MP 2800+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom E3815

#1091

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

3214%

#1092

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

3166%

#1093

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

2907%

#1094

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

2894%

#1095

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

2867%

#1097

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

2769%

#1098

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

2655%

#1099

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

2651%

#1100

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

2579%

#1103

Atom E3815

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#1104

Pentium 997

MSRP: $134|Avg: $10

99%

#1105

Pentium A1018

MSRP: $132|Avg: $15

99%

#1106

Core i5-2430M

MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A

98%

#1108

Pentium Dual Core T4500

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

98%

#1109

Celeron B820

MSRP: $86|Avg: $15

97%

#1110

Pentium B980

MSRP: $125|Avg: $35

96%

#1111

Celeron 867

MSRP: $86|Avg: $15

96%

#1112

Pentium B970

MSRP: $125|Avg: $39

96%

#1113

Core i5-2410M

MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A

95%

#1114

Pentium T2370

MSRP: $86|Avg: $10

95%

#1115

Pentium N3710

MSRP: $161|Avg: $50

94%

#1116

Core m3-7Y30

MSRP: $281|Avg: $281

94%

#1117

Pentium 977

MSRP: $134|Avg: $10

94%

#1118

Core i7-2715QE

MSRP: $378|Avg: $50

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon MP 2800+

Xeon Platinum 8454H

MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A

150596%

Xeon Gold 6240R

MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A

28434%

#10

Xeon 6337P

MSRP: $60|Avg: $5

25262%

#15

EPYC 9174F

MSRP: $194|Avg: $30

19516%

#1026

Athlon MP 2800+

MSRP: $275|Avg: $10

100%

#1027

Xeon L3110

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $950

97%

#1028

Xeon 2.66

MSRP: $337|Avg: $10

96%

#1029

Xeon X5272

MSRP: $1172|Avg: $76

90%

#1030

Xeon Platinum 8260L

MSRP: $7500|Avg: $750

49%

#1031

Xeon 3.20

MSRP: $851|Avg: $10

49%

#1032

Xeon X5355

MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4000

33%

#1033

Xeon E5420

MSRP: $7214|Avg: $6500

20%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom E3815 (2013) utilizes 22 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Atom E3815	Athlon MP 2800+
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-I (2013) / 22 nm)	🛑 Legacy (K7 (2000−2004) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon MP 2800+ (2003) relies on 130 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Atom E3815	Athlon MP 2800+
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Atom E3815 Benchmark Check

Athlon MP 2800+ Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom E3815 and Athlon MP 2800+

Atom E3815

The Atom E3815 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.47 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 365 points. Launch price was $134.

Athlon MP 2800+

The Athlon MP 2800+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 May 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the K7 (2000−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.13 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 380 points. Launch price was $275.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Atom E3815 and Athlon MP 2800+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.47 GHz on the Atom E3815 versus 2.13 GHz on the Athlon MP 2800+ — a 36.7% clock advantage for the Athlon MP 2800+. The Atom E3815 uses the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Athlon MP 2800+ uses K7 (2000−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Atom E3815 scores 365 against the Athlon MP 2800+'s 380 — a 4% lead for the Athlon MP 2800+.

Feature	Atom E3815	Athlon MP 2800+
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.47 GHz	2.13 GHz+45%
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512 kB
Process	22 nm-83%	130 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-I (2013)	K7 (2000−2004)
PassMark	365	380+4%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1066 on the Atom E3815 versus DDR-266 on the Athlon MP 2800+ — the Atom E3815 supports -204.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom E3815 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Atom E3815) vs 0 (Athlon MP 2800+) — the Atom E3815 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1170 (Atom E3815) and AMD Socket A (Athlon MP 2800+).

Feature	Atom E3815	Athlon MP 2800+
Socket	FCBGA1170	—
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1066	DDR-266
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
RAM Channels	1	1
ECC Support	✅	✅
PCIe Lanes	4	0