
Atom E3815 vs Core Solo T1300

Atom E3815

Core Solo T1300
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom E3815 is positioned at rank 1103 and the Core Solo T1300 is on rank 1240, so the Atom E3815 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Atom E3815
Performance Per Dollar Core Solo T1300
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Atom E3815 | Core Solo T1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-I (2013) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Atom E3815 | Core Solo T1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Atom E3815 and Core Solo T1300

Atom E3815
The Atom E3815 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.47 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 365 points. Launch price was $134.

Core Solo T1300
The Core Solo T1300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.66 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 385 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Atom E3815 and Core Solo T1300 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.47 GHz on the Atom E3815 versus 1.66 GHz on the Core Solo T1300 — a 12.1% clock advantage for the Core Solo T1300. The Atom E3815 uses the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core Solo T1300 uses Yonah (2005−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Atom E3815 scores 365 against the Core Solo T1300's 385 — a 5.3% lead for the Core Solo T1300. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Atom E3815 | Core Solo T1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.47 GHz | 1.66 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | — | 1.66 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 2 MB+300% |
| Process | 22 nm-66% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Bay Trail-I (2013) | Yonah (2005−2006) |
| PassMark | 365 | 385+5% |
Memory & Platform
The Atom E3815 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core Solo T1300 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Atom E3815 | Core Solo T1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1066 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 1 | — |
| ECC Support | ✅ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | — |
Advanced Features
The Atom E3815 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Core Solo T1300 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Atom E3815 | Core Solo T1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















