
Atom E3815

Ryzen 5 3600
Atom E3815 vs Ryzen 5 3600 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Atom E3815 vs Ryzen 5 3600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Atom E3815 vs Ryzen 5 3600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Atom E3815
2013Why buy it
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Ryzen 5 3600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (365 vs 17,685).
- ❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +2140.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
- ✅500% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Atom E3815.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Atom E3815 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Atom E3815 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Atom E3815?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom E3815 vs Ryzen 5 3600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom E3815
The Atom E3815 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.47 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 365 points. Launch price was $134.


Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.
Processing Power
The Atom E3815 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 3600 has 5 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.47 GHz on the Atom E3815 versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 96.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600. The Atom E3815 uses the Bay Trail-I (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Atom E3815 scores 365 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 191.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom E3815 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Atom E3815 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 6 / 12+500% |
| Boost Clock | 1.47 GHz | 4.2 GHz+186% |
| Base Clock | — | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-68% |
| Architecture | Bay Trail-I (2013) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 365 | 17,685+4745% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 9,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,295 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,898 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom E3815 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1066 on the Atom E3815 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 — the Ryzen 5 3600 supports 200.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 3600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom E3815) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 3600). PCIe lanes: 4 (Atom E3815) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) — the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1170 (Atom E3815) and AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600).
| Feature | Atom E3815 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0+100% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1066 | DDR4-3200+200% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 128 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 24+500% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Atom E3815) / Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). The Atom E3815 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Ryzen 5 3600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Atom E3815 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) | — |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
| Target Use | — | Gaming/Budget Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













