Atom N2800 vs Athlon 64 X2 6000+
Atom N2800
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom N2800 is positioned at rank 147 and the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is on rank 1077, so the Atom N2800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Atom N2800
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 6000+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Atom N2800 | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($3) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Cedarview-M (2011−2012) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Windsor (2006−2007) / 90 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Atom N2800 | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+568%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($3) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Atom N2800 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+
Atom N2800
The Atom N2800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview-M (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.87 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,829 points. Launch price was $47.
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,825 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Atom N2800 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Athlon 64 X2 6000+'s 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.87 GHz on the Atom N2800 versus 3.1 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ — a 49.5% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 6000+. The Atom N2800 uses the Cedarview-M (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ uses Windsor (2006−2007) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Atom N2800 scores 1,829 against the Athlon 64 X2 6000+'s 1,825 — a 0.2% lead for the Atom N2800. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Atom N2800 | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.87 GHz | 3.1 GHz+66% |
| Base Clock | 1.86 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K |
| Process | 32 nm-64% | 90 nm |
| Architecture | Cedarview-M (2011−2012) | Windsor (2006−2007) |
| PassMark | 1,829 | 1,825 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom N2800 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ uses AM2 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Atom N2800 versus DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ — the Atom N2800 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom N2800) vs 2 (Athlon 64 X2 6000+). PCIe lanes: 4 (Atom N2800) vs 0 (Athlon 64 X2 6000+) — the Atom N2800 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel NM10 (Atom N2800) and AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 X2 6000+).
| Feature | Atom N2800 | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA559 | AM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066+50% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 16 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 0 |
Advanced Features
The Atom N2800 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3650), while the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Atom N2800 | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel GMA 3650 | — |
Value Analysis
The Atom N2800 launched at $47 MSRP, while the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ debuted at $450. At current prices ($3 vs $20), the Atom N2800 is $17 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Atom N2800 delivers 609.7 pts/$ vs 91.3 pts/$ for the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ — making the Atom N2800 the 147.9% better value option.
| Feature | Atom N2800 | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $47-90% | $450 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3-85% | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 609.7+568% | 91.3 |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2007 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Atom N2800 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+
