Atom N2800 vs Atom C3508
Atom N2800
Atom C3508
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom N2800 is positioned at rank 147 and the Atom C3508 is on rank 409, so the Atom N2800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Atom N2800
Performance Per Dollar Atom C3508
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Atom N2800 | Atom C3508 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Cedarview-M (2011−2012) / 32 nm) | ✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Atom N2800 | Atom C3508 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Atom N2800 and Atom C3508
Atom N2800
The Atom N2800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview-M (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.87 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,829 points. Launch price was $47.
Atom C3508
The Atom C3508 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,831 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Atom N2800 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Atom C3508 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom C3508 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.87 GHz on the Atom N2800 versus 1.6 GHz on the Atom C3508 — a 15.6% clock advantage for the Atom N2800 (base: 1.86 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Atom N2800 uses the Cedarview-M (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Atom C3508 uses Goldmont (2016−2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Atom N2800 scores 1,829 against the Atom C3508's 1,831 — a 0.1% lead for the Atom C3508. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom N2800 vs 8 MB on the Atom C3508.
| Feature | Atom N2800 | Atom C3508 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 1.87 GHz+17% | 1.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.86 GHz+16% | 1.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 8 MB+1500% |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Cedarview-M (2011−2012) | Goldmont (2016−2017) |
| PassMark | 1,829 | 1,831 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom N2800 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom C3508 uses FCBGA1310 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Atom N2800 versus DDR4-1866 on the Atom C3508 — the Atom C3508 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3508 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 193.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom N2800) vs 2 (Atom C3508). PCIe lanes: 4 (Atom N2800) vs 12 (Atom C3508) — the Atom C3508 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel NM10 (Atom N2800) and Intel FCBGA1310 (Atom C3508).
| Feature | Atom N2800 | Atom C3508 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA559 | FCBGA1310 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | DDR4-1866+33% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 256 GB+6300% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 12+200% |
Advanced Features
The Atom N2800 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3650), while the Atom C3508 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Atom N2800 | Atom C3508 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel GMA 3650 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Atom N2800 and Atom C3508
