Atom N2800 vs Pentium M 765

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom N2800 vs Pentium M 765 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom N2800 vs Pentium M 765: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom N2800

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 7W instead of 21W, a 14W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3650, while Pentium M 765 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,829 vs 1,834).
❌Launch MSRP is still $47 MSRP, while Pentium M 765 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Pentium M 765

2004

Why buy it

✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌200% higher power demand at 21W vs 7W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom N2800 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium M 765 better than Atom N2800?

Yes. Pentium M 765 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium M 765 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium M 765 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium M 765 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Pentium M 765 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $47 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Atom N2800 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 0.1% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom N2800 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2004). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom N2800 vs Pentium M 765 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom N2800

The Atom N2800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview-M (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.87 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,829 points. Launch price was $47.

Pentium M 765

The Pentium M 765 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,834 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom N2800 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium M 765 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Atom N2800 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.87 GHz on the Atom N2800 versus 2.1 GHz on the Pentium M 765 — a 11.6% clock advantage for the Pentium M 765 (base: 1.86 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Atom N2800 uses the Cedarview-M (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium M 765 uses Dothan (2004−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Atom N2800 scores 1,829 against the Pentium M 765's 1,834 — a 0.3% lead for the Pentium M 765. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Atom N2800	Pentium M 765
Cores / Threads	2 / 4+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.87 GHz	2.1 GHz+12%
Base Clock	1.86 GHz	2.1 GHz+13%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+25500%	2 MB
Process	32 nm-64%	90 nm
Architecture	Cedarview-M (2011−2012)	Dothan (2004−2005)
PassMark	1,829	1,834

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom N2800 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium M 765 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Atom N2800 versus DDR2-533 on the Pentium M 765 — the Atom N2800 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (Atom N2800) vs 2 (Pentium M 765). PCIe lanes: 4 (Atom N2800) vs 16 (Pentium M 765) — the Pentium M 765 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel NM10 (Atom N2800) and 915GM,945GT (Pentium M 765).

Feature	Atom N2800	Pentium M 765
Socket	FCBGA559	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066+100%	DDR2-533
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	16+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom N2800) / false (Pentium M 765). The Atom N2800 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3650), while the Pentium M 765 requires a dedicated GPU.