Atom C3508 vs Atom N2800
Atom C3508
Atom N2800
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom C3508 is positioned at rank 409 and the Atom N2800 is on rank 147, so the Atom N2800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Atom C3508
Performance Per Dollar Atom N2800
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Atom C3508 | Atom N2800 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Cedarview-M (2011−2012) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Atom C3508 | Atom N2800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Atom C3508 and Atom N2800
Atom C3508
The Atom C3508 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,831 points. Launch price was $69.
Atom N2800
The Atom N2800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Cedarview-M (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.87 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 6.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,829 points. Launch price was $47.
Processing Power
The Atom C3508 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Atom N2800 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Atom C3508 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Atom C3508 versus 1.87 GHz on the Atom N2800 — a 15.6% clock advantage for the Atom N2800 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.86 GHz). The Atom C3508 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Atom N2800 uses Cedarview-M (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3508 scores 1,831 against the Atom N2800's 1,829 — a 0.1% lead for the Atom C3508. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Atom C3508 vs 0 kB on the Atom N2800.
| Feature | Atom C3508 | Atom N2800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 1.6 GHz | 1.87 GHz+17% |
| Base Clock | 1.6 GHz | 1.86 GHz+16% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+1500% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Goldmont (2016−2017) | Cedarview-M (2011−2012) |
| PassMark | 1,831 | 1,829 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom C3508 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom N2800 uses FCBGA559 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-1866 on the Atom C3508 versus DDR3-1066 on the Atom N2800 — the Atom C3508 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3508 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 193.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Atom C3508) vs 1 (Atom N2800). PCIe lanes: 12 (Atom C3508) vs 4 (Atom N2800) — the Atom C3508 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1310 (Atom C3508) and Intel NM10 (Atom N2800).
| Feature | Atom C3508 | Atom N2800 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1310 | FCBGA559 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-1866+33% | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+6300% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2+100% | 1 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 12+200% | 4 |
Advanced Features
The Atom N2800 includes integrated graphics (Intel GMA 3650), while the Atom C3508 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Atom C3508 | Atom N2800 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel GMA 3650 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Atom C3508 and Atom N2800
