Atom C3508
VS
Core i7-740QM

Atom C3508 vs Core i7-740QM

Intel

Atom C3508

4 Cores4 Thrd11.25 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core i7-740QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.93 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom C3508 is positioned at rank 409 and the Core i7-740QM is on rank 1209, so the Atom C3508 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom C3508

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
5675%
#3
Xeon W-11955M
MSRP: $623|Avg: $450
95%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1072%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
952%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
735%
#274
EPYC 7313
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $764
98%
#275
Xeon w5-2455X
MSRP: $1039|Avg: $1049
98%
#276
Xeon w3-2425
MSRP: $529|Avg: $529
97%
#278
Xeon Gold 5416S
MSRP: $1445|Avg: N/A
96%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
MSRP: $1149|Avg: $1130
95%
#409
Atom C3508
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#416
Xeon E3-1276 v3
MSRP: $213|Avg: $244
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-740QM

#1197
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
6025%
#1198
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
5936%
#1199
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
5450%
#1200
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
5425%
#1201
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
5375%
#1203
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
5191%
#1204
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4977%
#1205
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4969%
#1206
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4836%
#1209
Core i7-740QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1211
Core 2 Solo SU3300
MSRP: $262|Avg: $50
98%
#1212
Celeron 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
97%
#1213
Celeron U3600
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
96%
#1216
Core 2 Quad Q9000
MSRP: $348|Avg: $15
94%
#1217
Core i5-2537M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
94%
#1218
Core i7-720QM
MSRP: $364|Avg: N/A
93%
#1219
Pentium U5400
MSRP: $289|Avg: $214
91%
#1220
Pentium T2330
MSRP: $150|Avg: $7
91%
#1221
Z-01
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
88%
#1222
Pentium T2310
MSRP: $150|Avg: $14
86%
#1223
Celeron SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
84%
#1224
Core i5-560UM
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
83%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom C3508 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4: 1866, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAtom C3508Core i7-740QM
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Clarksfield (2009−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-740QM (2010) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAtom C3508Core i7-740QM
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom C3508 and Core i7-740QM

Intel

Atom C3508

The Atom C3508 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,831 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i7-740QM

The Core i7-740QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarksfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.73 GHz, with boost up to 2.93 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,842 points. Launch price was $546.

Processing Power

The Atom C3508 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-740QM's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Atom C3508 versus 2.93 GHz on the Core i7-740QM — a 58.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-740QM (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.73 GHz). The Atom C3508 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-740QM uses Clarksfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3508 scores 1,831 against the Core i7-740QM's 1,842 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i7-740QM. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Atom C3508 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-740QM.

FeatureAtom C3508Core i7-740QM
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz
2.93 GHz+83%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
1.73 GHz+8%
L3 Cache
8 MB+33%
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
8 MB+3100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-69%
45 nm
Architecture
Goldmont (2016−2017)
Clarksfield (2009−2010)
PassMark
1,831
1,842
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom C3508 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-740QM uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-1866 on the Atom C3508 versus 1333 on the Core i7-740QM — the Core i7-740QM supports 198.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3508 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 8 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Atom C3508) vs 16 (Core i7-740QM) — the Core i7-740QM offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1310 (Atom C3508) and PM55,HM55,QM57 (Core i7-740QM).

FeatureAtom C3508Core i7-740QM
Socket
FCBGA1310
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-1866
1333+33225%
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB+3355443100%
8
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
16+33%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom C3508) / true (Core i7-740QM). Direct competitor: Core i7-740QM rivals Core 2 Quad Q9000.

FeatureAtom C3508Core i7-740QM
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true