Atom C3508
VS
Core i3-2105

Atom C3508 vs Core i3-2105

Intel

Atom C3508

4 Cores4 Thrd11.25 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core i3-2105

2 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom C3508 is positioned at rank 409 and the Core i3-2105 is on rank 935, so the Atom C3508 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom C3508

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
5675%
#3
Xeon W-11955M
MSRP: $623|Avg: $450
95%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1072%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
952%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
735%
#274
EPYC 7313
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $764
98%
#275
Xeon w5-2455X
MSRP: $1039|Avg: $1049
98%
#276
Xeon w3-2425
MSRP: $529|Avg: $529
97%
#278
Xeon Gold 5416S
MSRP: $1445|Avg: N/A
96%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
MSRP: $1149|Avg: $1130
95%
#409
Atom C3508
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#416
Xeon E3-1276 v3
MSRP: $213|Avg: $244
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-2105

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
23420%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
22129%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
16068%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4840%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3834%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3354%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1921%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1896%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1726%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1726%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1707%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1661%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1638%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1631%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1616%
#934
Athlon II X3 405e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
100%
#935
Core i3-2105
MSRP: $138|Avg: $30
100%
#936
Core i3-3225
MSRP: $172|Avg: $167
99%
#937
Athlon II X3 400e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
99%
#938
Core i3-3220T
MSRP: $149|Avg: $146
98%
#939
Athlon II X2 245e
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
98%
#940
Athlon II X2 240e
MSRP: $77|Avg: $77
98%
#941
Pentium G630T
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
98%
#942
Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition
MSRP: $990|Avg: $175
98%
#945
Core i5-650
MSRP: $176|Avg: $22
96%
#946
A10-6790B
MSRP: $122|Avg: $50
95%
#947
Phenom X3 8600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
95%
#948
Core i3-6100TE
MSRP: $250|Avg: $90
95%
#949
FX-4320
MSRP: $250|Avg: $100
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom C3508 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4: 1866, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAtom C3508Core i3-2105
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i3-2105 (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAtom C3508Core i3-2105
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom C3508 and Core i3-2105

Intel

Atom C3508

The Atom C3508 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,831 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i3-2105

The Core i3-2105 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 22 May 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,837 points. Launch price was $145.

Processing Power

The Atom C3508 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-2105 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Atom C3508 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Atom C3508 versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i3-2105 — a 63.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-2105 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Atom C3508 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i3-2105 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3508 scores 1,831 against the Core i3-2105's 1,837 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i3-2105. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Atom C3508 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2105.

FeatureAtom C3508Core i3-2105
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz
3.1 GHz+94%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
3.1 GHz+94%
L3 Cache
8 MB+167%
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
8 MB+3100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Goldmont (2016−2017)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,831
1,837
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom C3508 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-2105 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-1866 on the Atom C3508 versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i3-2105 — the Atom C3508 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3508 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Atom C3508) vs 16 (Core i3-2105) — the Core i3-2105 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureAtom C3508Core i3-2105
Socket
FCBGA1310
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-1866+33%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB+700%
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
16+33%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom C3508) / VT-x (Core i3-2105). The Core i3-2105 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Atom C3508 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-2105 targets Desktop.

FeatureAtom C3508Core i3-2105
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Desktop