Atom C3508
VS
Phenom II X3 B77

Atom C3508 vs Phenom II X3 B77

Intel

Atom C3508

4 Cores4 Thrd11.25 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2017
VS
AMD

Phenom II X3 B77

3 Cores3 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom C3508 is positioned at rank 409 and the Phenom II X3 B77 is on rank 1057, so the Atom C3508 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom C3508

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
5675%
#3
Xeon W-11955M
MSRP: $623|Avg: $450
95%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1072%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
952%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
735%
#274
EPYC 7313
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $764
98%
#275
Xeon w5-2455X
MSRP: $1039|Avg: $1049
98%
#276
Xeon w3-2425
MSRP: $529|Avg: $529
97%
#278
Xeon Gold 5416S
MSRP: $1445|Avg: N/A
96%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
MSRP: $1149|Avg: $1130
95%
#409
Atom C3508
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#416
Xeon E3-1276 v3
MSRP: $213|Avg: $244
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X3 B77

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
47518%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
44899%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
32601%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
9821%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
7779%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
6805%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3898%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3847%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3503%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3502%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
3463%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
3370%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
3323%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
3309%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
3279%
#1057
Phenom II X3 B77
MSRP: $281|Avg: $35
100%
#1058
Core 2 Duo E6300
MSRP: $163|Avg: $5
99%
#1059
Core 2 Duo E6400
MSRP: $183|Avg: $10
98%
#1060
Core 2 Duo E8300
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
97%
#1061
Phenom X4 9500
MSRP: $247|Avg: $30
96%
#1062
Celeron D 352
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
92%
#1063
Core i7-970
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $289
92%
#1064
Core i7-880
MSRP: $583|Avg: $40
90%
#1065
Pentium D 820
MSRP: $241|Avg: $20
89%
#1066
Celeron 2.10
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
89%
#1067
Core i7-950
MSRP: $562|Avg: $15
88%
#1068
Sempron 3100+
MSRP: $65|Avg: $15
87%
#1069
Athlon II X4 635
MSRP: $400|Avg: $250
86%
#1070
Core 2 Duo E6750
MSRP: $183|Avg: $15
86%
#1071
Core i7-940
MSRP: $562|Avg: $90
82%
#1072
Celeron 2.40
MSRP: $69|Avg: $13
76%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom C3508 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4: 1866, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAtom C3508Phenom II X3 B77
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($35)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Heka (2009−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Phenom II X3 B77 (2010) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAtom C3508Phenom II X3 B77
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($35)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom C3508 and Phenom II X3 B77

Intel

Atom C3508

The Atom C3508 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,831 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Phenom II X3 B77

The Phenom II X3 B77 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Heka (2009−2010) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,844 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Atom C3508 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Phenom II X3 B77 offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Atom C3508 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Atom C3508 versus 3.2 GHz on the Phenom II X3 B77 — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Phenom II X3 B77 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Atom C3508 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Phenom II X3 B77 uses Heka (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3508 scores 1,831 against the Phenom II X3 B77's 1,844 — a 0.7% lead for the Phenom II X3 B77. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Atom C3508 vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X3 B77.

FeatureAtom C3508Phenom II X3 B77
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+33%
3 / 3
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz
3.2 GHz+100%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
3.2 GHz+100%
L3 Cache
8 MB+33%
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
8 MB+1500%
512 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-69%
45 nm
Architecture
Goldmont (2016−2017)
Heka (2009−2010)
PassMark
1,831
1,844
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom C3508 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X3 B77 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-1866 on the Atom C3508 versus DDR3-1333 on the Phenom II X3 B77 — the Atom C3508 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3508 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Atom C3508) vs 0 (Phenom II X3 B77) — the Atom C3508 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1310 (Atom C3508) and AM3 (Phenom II X3 B77).

FeatureAtom C3508Phenom II X3 B77
Socket
FCBGA1310
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-1866+33%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB+700%
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
0