Atom N435
VS
Atom E680

Atom N435 vs Atom E680

Intel

Atom N435

1 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.33 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Atom E680

1 Cores2 Thrd4 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom N435 is positioned at rank 646 and the Atom E680 is on rank 952, so the Atom N435 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom N435

#634
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
876%
#635
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
863%
#636
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
792%
#637
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
789%
#638
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
781%
#640
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
755%
#641
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
724%
#642
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
722%
#643
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
703%
#646
Atom N435
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#650
Core i5-1345UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $312
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom E680

#940
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1806%
#941
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1779%
#942
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1633%
#943
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1626%
#944
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1611%
#946
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1556%
#947
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1492%
#948
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1489%
#949
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1449%
#952
Atom E680
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#954
Core i7-5850EQ
MSRP: $435|Avg: $370
100%
#956
Core i7-4810MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
99%
#959
Celeron Dual-Core T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
98%
#960
Celeron 4305UE
MSRP: $107|Avg: $107
98%
#963
Core i7-10510U
MSRP: $409|Avg: N/A
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Atom E680 leads in gaming performance. However, the Atom N435 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightAtom N435Atom E680
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Pinetrail (2009−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Tunnel Creek (2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAtom N435Atom E680
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom N435 and Atom E680

Intel

Atom N435

The Atom N435 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Pinetrail (2009−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.33 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA559. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 335 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Atom E680

The Atom E680 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Tunnel Creek (2010) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA676. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 325 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Atom N435 and Atom E680 share an identical 1-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.33 GHz on the Atom N435 versus 1.6 GHz on the Atom E680 — a 18.4% clock advantage for the Atom E680. The Atom N435 uses the Pinetrail (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Atom E680 uses Tunnel Creek (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom N435 scores 335 against the Atom E680's 325 — a 3% lead for the Atom N435.

FeatureAtom N435Atom E680
Cores / Threads
1 / 2
1 / 2
Boost Clock
1.33 GHz
1.6 GHz+20%
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
512 kB (per core)
Process
45 nm
45 nm
Architecture
Pinetrail (2009−2011)
Tunnel Creek (2010)
PassMark
335+3%
325
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom N435 uses the FCBGA559 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom E680 uses BGA676 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-800 on the Atom N435 versus DDR2-800 on the Atom E680 — the Atom N435 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 2 GB of RAM. Both feature 1-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Atom N435) vs 4 (Atom E680) — the Atom E680 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel NM10 (Atom N435) and Intel FCBGA518 (Atom E680).

FeatureAtom N435Atom E680
Socket
FCBGA559
BGA676
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-800+50%
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
RAM Channels
1
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Both include integrated graphics Intel GMA 3150 (Atom N435) and Intel GMA 600 (Atom E680) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.

FeatureAtom N435Atom E680
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel GMA 3150
Intel GMA 600